Posterior hypospadias: Evaluation of a paradigm shift from single to staged repair. Issue 1 (February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Badawy, H.; Orabi, S.; Hanno, A.; Abdelhamid, H.
• Is Part Of: Journal of pediatric urology. Volume 14:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: 28.e1
• Page End: 28.e8
• Publication Date: 2018-02
• Subjects: Proximal hypospadias -- Single stage -- Staged repair -- Bracka repair; Pediatric urology -- Periodicals; Urologic Diseases -- Periodicals; Urogenital Diseases -- Periodicals; Urologic Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Child; Infant; Urologie pédiatrique -- Périodiques; Appareil urinaire -- Maladies -- Périodiques; Pédiatrie; Urologie; Pediatric urology; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 618.926
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.07.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1477-5131

Abstract

Summary: Introduction: Repair of posterior hypospadias is a current dilemma. Single versus staged repair is the main question to answer. The answer is not easily reached due to lack of comparative studies. Hence such studies are not available, the reports of a change from one approach to the other one are important to point out the results of each procedure in the same hands and in the same center. Herein, we report our results of the repair of posterior hypospadias shifting from single stage to staged repair. Patients and methods: 65 children were operated in a single Centre in the period from 2011–2016 using single stage repair by dorsal island flap in the first 40 children and then a shift to staged repair involved 25 children repaired using Bracka procedure, children are evaluated for the outcome and for the development of complications during the period of follow up. Results: The mean age of children operated using single stage technique was 2.8 years (0.83–12.0), Onlay repair was performed in 29 cases (72.5%), while a tube was performed in 11 cases (27.5%). The success rate was 55% with 45% complication rate, in the form of infection in (2.5%), partial dehiscence in (10%), urethrocutaneous fistula in (15%), meatal stenosis in (12.5%), urethral diverticulum in (5%). 25 children were operated using staged repair according to Bracka using inner preputial graft in fresh cases and buccal graft in redo cases. Mean age of 4.5 years (7 months–18 years), 15 primary cases and 10 redo cases, 12 penoscrotal, 11 scrotal and 2 perineal cases, preputial graft in 17, buccal graft in 8, 25 children completed their second stage, tunica vaginalis cover was used in 23 children, localized penile skin dartos was used in 2 children, the overall success after second stage was 80%, complications were in the form of 4 fistulas (16%), hematoma and complete disruption in a redo case (4%). There is a significant statistical difference in the incidence of complications between both groups in favor of lower complication rate (20%) in the staged group versus the single stage group (45%) with a P = 0.0419. Conclusion: Staged repair considerably improves complication rate of posterior hypospadias reconstruction compared to single stage repair using pedicled island flap. More follow up and continuous reporting of honest complication rate is needed to improve the outcome of a complex pathology and to help the choice of the best procedure.