A qualitative numerical study of glucose dynamics in patients with stress hyperglycemia and diabetes receiving intermittent and continuous enteral feeds. (2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Strilka, Richard J.; Trexler, Scott T.; Sjulin, Tyson J.; Armen, Scott B.
• Is Part Of: Informatics in medicine unlocked. Volume 10(2018)
• Page Start: 108
• Page End: 116
• Publication Date: 2018
• Subjects: SH Stress hyperglycemia -- GV Glucose variability -- MGC Mean glucose concentration -- Gmax Glucose concentration maximum -- Gsd Glucose concentration standard deviation -- IGF Intermittent gastric feeds -- cPPF Continuous post-pyloric feeds -- ICU Intensive care unit -- ↑Ic Increase renal clearance of insulin -- CGF Continuous gastric feeds; Stress hyperglycemia -- Enteral feeds -- Glucose variability -- Mean glucose -- Diabetes -- Computer simulation; Medical informatics -- Periodicals; 610.285
• DOI: 10.1016/j.imu.2017.12.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2352-9148

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Using 12 healthy adults, it was shown that a reduction in mean glucose concentration follows intermittent gastric feeds, not continuous: a desirable result for hospitalized patients. A numerical study comparing glucose dynamics after intermittent gastric and continuous post-pyloric feeds may inform the design of a similar clinical study in the critical care setting. Methods: A mathematical model was used to construct a small virtual crossover study comparing intermittent gastric feeds and continuous post-pyloric feeds. The model, validated for eight diabetic patients, produced maximum glucose concentration, mean glucose concentration and glucose concentration standard deviation data. Simulations were repeated after renal insulin clearance was increased by 50%, a common physiologic alteration in critical illness. Five hypothetical patients with stress hyperglycemia also underwent simulation. Results: Mean glucose concentration was significantly lower after intermittent gastric feeds in type 1 diabetics and in the stress hyperglycemia patients. Without insulin therapy, intermittent gastric feeds increased maximum glucose concentration more than continuous post-pyloric feeds, and glucose concentration standard deviation was largest after intermittent gastric feeds in all patients. Also, the continuous glucose concentration data suggests that the total amount of insulin required to treat patients with stress hyperglycemia would be least in the intermittent feed arm. Finally, data collection with a continuous glucose-monitoring device might be required to resolve maximum glucose and glucose standard deviation differences between the study arms. Conclusions: This is the first examination of glucose dynamics following intermittent gastric feeds in a critical care setting. A small crossover clinical study could demonstrate that patients with stress hyperglycemia require less insulin following intermittent, not continuous, enteric feeds. Preliminary data from a clinical trial is reviewed and is found consistent with the results reported here.