Questionable research practices in academia: antecedents and consequences. Issue 2 (12th March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Grant, David B.; Kovács, Gyöngyi; Spens, Karen
• Is Part Of: European business review. Volume 30:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 101
• Page End: 127
• Publication Date: 2018-03-12
• Subjects: Academia -- Research -- Relevance -- Logistics and supply chain management -- Questionable research practices -- Rigour; Industrial management -- Periodicals; Management -- Periodicals; Business -- Periodicals; 658.005
• DOI: 10.1108/EBR-12-2016-0155
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0955-534X

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to discuss questionable research practices (QRPs) in business research, particularly in the logistics and supply chain management discipline, in light of antecedents influenced by the current academic environment and the consequences for academic rigour and relevance to stimulate thinking and debate among the academic community. Design/methodology/approach: A literature review and autoethnographic approach were used to examine these issues based on over 60 years' collective academic experience of the authors. Data were collected from discussions among the paper's authors as well as recounting open discussions with other academics and journal editors to collate their observations. Findings: Evidence is provided of issues the authors have seen first-hand where antecedents in the academic environment influences QRPs, which then detrimentally affect research rigour and relevance, integrity and proper contributions to ground-breaking research and knowledge advancement. Research limitations/implications: This paper is based on personal observations and experiences of the three authors as well as open-ended discussions with others in the academic community. Suggestions are provided for various academic stakeholders to address these issues. Practical implications: Practical implications are only provided for academics in their roles as authors, journal editors and reviewers. Social implications: Encouraging the academic community to eliminate QRPs to improve the rigour, relevance and quality of research will provide more credibility and integrity resulting in better impact and outcomes for society at large. Originality/value: The value of this paper is in stimulating thinking and debate among academics to return to core issues and values in academia opposed to focusing on narrow university goals focussed on other antecedents of QRPs.