Complexities of local cultural protection in conservation: the case of an Endangered African primate and forest groves protected by social taboos. Issue 2 (27th November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Baker, Lynne R.; Tanimola, Adebowale A.; Olubode, Oluseun S.
• Is Part Of: Oryx. Volume 52:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 262
• Page End: 270
• Publication Date: 2017-11-27
• Subjects: Biocultural diversity, -- census, -- Cercopithecus sclateri, -- informal institutions, -- monitoring, -- Nigeria, -- sacred, -- Sclater's monkey; Wildlife conservation -- Periodicals; Nature conservation -- Periodicals; 639.9
• DOI: 10.1017/S0030605317001223
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0030-6053

Abstract

Abstract: Globally, some species and habitats receive protection through local belief systems (e.g. indigenous religions) and informal institutions (e.g. social norms and taboos). Where such systems represent the only form of protection for threatened species or environments, they may be critical to the survival of those taxa and sites. We evaluated the effectiveness of long-standing social taboos protecting the Endangered Sclater's monkey Cercopithecus sclateri and forest groves in a community complex in Nigeria. Across its range (southern Nigeria), Sclater's monkey is effectively protected only through informal institutions. At our study site, we conducted a census of the monkey population; measured the area of sacred groves; and compared our findings with estimates from 2010 and 2005, respectively. We observed a 36% increase in the monkey population (from 249 to 339 individuals) in a core survey area. No groves that we assessed in 2005 had been fully cleared. Although we observed a decline in tree cover for several sacred forests, most groves used regularly by monkeys had changed little. The social taboos related to monkeys and sacred groves remain largely intact; however, other factors threaten the monkey population and remaining forests in this community complex, including the removal of tree patches to accommodate the construction of large residential buildings and the demand for cropland, as well as increased dumping of waste in forested sites. This study highlights the conservation importance and limitations of local cultural protection, as well as the challenges presented when such protection conflicts with community-perceived development needs.