Comparative Analysis of H&E and Prussian Blue Staining in a Mouse Model of Cerebral Microbleeds. (November 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liu, Shuo; Grigoryan, Mher Mahoney; Vasilevko, Vitaly; Sumbria, Rachita K.; Paganini-Hill, Annlia; Cribbs, David H.; Fisher, Mark J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry. Volume 62:Number 11(2014:Nov.)
• Page Start: 767
• Page End: 773
• Publication Date: 2014-11
• Subjects: Cerebral microbleeds -- H&E -- Prussian Blue -- LPS; Histochemistry -- Periodicals; Cytochemistry -- Periodicals; Histocytochemistry -- methods; Histological Techniques; 572.05
• DOI: 10.1369/0022155414546692
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-1554

Abstract

Cerebral microbleeds are microscopic hemorrhages with deposits of blood products in the brain, which can be visualized with MRI and are implicated in cerebrovascular diseases. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Perl's Prussian blue are popular staining methods used to localize cerebral microbleeds in pathology. This paper compared these two staining techniques in a mouse model of cerebral microbleeds. We used lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to induce cerebral microhemorrhages. C57B6 mice were treated with LPS (5 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle at baseline and at 24 hr. The brains were extracted 48 hr after the first injection and adjacent coronal sections were stained with H&E and Prussian blue to compare the effectiveness of the two staining techniques. H&E-positive stains were increased with LPS treatment and were correlated with grossly visible microhemorrhages on the brain surface; Prussian blue-positive stains, by comparison, showed no significant increase with LPS treatment and did not correlate with either H&E-positive stains or surface microhemorrhages. H&E staining is thus a more reliable indicator of acute bleeding events induced by LPS in this model within a short time span.