Behavioral Genetics in Criminal and Civil Courts. Issue 6 (November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sabatello, Maya; Appelbaum, Paul S.
• Is Part Of: Harvard review of psychiatry. Volume 25:Issue 6(2017)
• Publication Date: 2017-11
• Subjects: behavioral genetic evidence -- child custody -- compulsory genetic testing -- criminal responsibility and punishment -- genetic privacy and confidentiality -- stigma -- torts; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; 616.89005
• DOI: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000141
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1067-3229

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: Although emerging findings in psychiatric and behavioral genetics create hope for improved prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders, the introduction of such data as evidence in criminal and civil proceedings raises a host of ethical, legal, and social issues. Should behavioral and psychiatric genetic data be admissible in judicial proceedings? If so, what are the various means for obtaining such evidence, and for what purposes should its admission be sought and permitted? How could—and should—such evidence affect judicial outcomes in criminal and civil proceedings? And what are the potential implications of using behavioral and psychiatric genetic evidence for individuals and communities, and for societal values of equality and justice? This article provides an overview of the historical and current developments in behavioral genetics. We then explore the extent to which behavioral genetic evidence has—and should—affect determinations of criminal responsibility and sentencing, as well as the possible ramifications of introducing such evidence in civil courts, with a focus on tort litigation and child custody disputes. We also consider two ways in which behavioral genetic evidence may come to court in the future—through genetic theft or the subpoena of a litigant's biospecimen data that was previously obtained for clinical or research purposes—and the concerns that these possibilities raise. Finally, we highlight the need for caution and for approaches to prevent the misuse of behavioral genetic evidence in courts.