Biomechanical evaluation of a novel integrated artificial axis: A finite element study. Issue 47 (November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zheng, Yongqiang; Wang, Jianhua; Liao, Suixiang; Zhang, Dongsheng; Zhang, Jinshan; Ma, Limin; Xia, Hong
• Other Names: Schaller. Bernhard section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 96:Issue 47(2017)
• Publication Date: 2017-11
• Subjects: anterior transpedicular screw -- atlantoaxial tumor -- biomechanics -- finite element analysis -- prosthesis of axis; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008597
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: Various modified instruments are used for the anterior reconstruction of the tumor lesion affecting the second cervical vertebra, but there have been no reports regarding individual integrated artificial axis (IAA) prosthesis fabricated by selective laser melting. In the present work, a new type of IAA prosthesis has been designed with a 3-dimensional (3D) finite element model of normal occiput-the fourth cervical vertebra being established to assess its biomechanics. For easy comparison, another 3D finite element model is also established for the T-shaped Harms cage and an additional posterior fixation was performed on each model. The models are tested under a preliminary loading of 40 N to simulate cervical physical action including flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation. Under various loads from 4 different directions, the maximum stress and displacement of the IAA are less than those of the modified T-shaped Harms cage. Except for flexion, the maximum stress of the third cervical vertebra endplate of the IAA is smaller than that of the modified T-shaped Harms cage. The new prosthesis with axis is a good choice for upper cervical operation, which not only can greatly increase the operation stability of the upper cervical segment but also could significantly reduce the risk of fixation failure due to Harms cage subsidence.