Core Outcome Domains for Clinical Trials on Somatic Symptom Disorder, Bodily Distress Disorder, and Functional Somatic Syndromes: European Network on Somatic Symptom Disorders Recommendations. Issue 9 (November 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Core Outcome Domains for Clinical Trials on Somatic Symptom Disorder, Bodily Distress Disorder, and Functional Somatic Syndromes: European Network on Somatic Symptom Disorders Recommendations. Issue 9 (November 2017)
- Main Title:
- Core Outcome Domains for Clinical Trials on Somatic Symptom Disorder, Bodily Distress Disorder, and Functional Somatic Syndromes
- Authors:
- Rief, Winfried
Burton, Chris
Frostholm, Lisbeth
Henningsen, Peter
Kleinstäuber, Maria
Kop, Willem J.
Löwe, Bernd
Martin, Alexandra
Malt, Ulrik
Rosmalen, Judith
Schröder, Andreas
Shedden-Mora, Meike
Toussaint, Anne
van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: Objective: The harmonization of core outcome domains in clinical trials facilitates comparison and pooling of data, and simplifies the preparation and review of research projects and comparison of risks and benefits of treatments. Therefore, we provide recommendations for the core outcome domains that should be considered in clinical trials on the efficacy and effectiveness of interventions for somatic symptom disorder, bodily distress disorder, and functional somatic syndromes. Methods: The European Network on Somatic Symptom Disorders group of more than 20 experts in the field met twice in Hamburg to discuss issues of assessment and intervention research in somatic symptom disorder, bodily distress disorder, and functional somatic syndromes. The consensus meetings identified core outcome domains that should be considered in clinical trials evaluating treatments for somatic symptom disorder and associated functional somatic syndromes. Results: The following core domains should be considered when defining ascertainment methods in clinical trials: a) classification of somatic symptom disorder/bodily distress disorder, associated functional somatic syndromes, and comorbid mental disorders (using structured clinical interviews), duration of symptoms, medical morbidity, and prior treatments; b) location, intensity, and interference of somatic symptoms; c) associated psychobehavioral features and biological markers; d) illness consequences (quality of life, disability,ABSTRACT: Objective: The harmonization of core outcome domains in clinical trials facilitates comparison and pooling of data, and simplifies the preparation and review of research projects and comparison of risks and benefits of treatments. Therefore, we provide recommendations for the core outcome domains that should be considered in clinical trials on the efficacy and effectiveness of interventions for somatic symptom disorder, bodily distress disorder, and functional somatic syndromes. Methods: The European Network on Somatic Symptom Disorders group of more than 20 experts in the field met twice in Hamburg to discuss issues of assessment and intervention research in somatic symptom disorder, bodily distress disorder, and functional somatic syndromes. The consensus meetings identified core outcome domains that should be considered in clinical trials evaluating treatments for somatic symptom disorder and associated functional somatic syndromes. Results: The following core domains should be considered when defining ascertainment methods in clinical trials: a) classification of somatic symptom disorder/bodily distress disorder, associated functional somatic syndromes, and comorbid mental disorders (using structured clinical interviews), duration of symptoms, medical morbidity, and prior treatments; b) location, intensity, and interference of somatic symptoms; c) associated psychobehavioral features and biological markers; d) illness consequences (quality of life, disability, health care utilization, health care costs; e) global improvement and treatment satisfaction; and f) unwanted negative effects. Conclusions: The proposed criteria are intended to improve synergies of clinical trials and to facilitate decision making when comparing different treatment approaches. These recommendations should not result in inflexible guidelines, but increase consistency across investigations in this field. Abstract : Supplemental digital content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Psychosomatic medicine. Volume 79:Issue 9(2017)
- Journal:
- Psychosomatic medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 79:Issue 9(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 79, Issue 9 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 79
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0079-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-11
- Subjects:
- somatic symptom disorder -- somatoform -- bodily distress -- functional somatic syndromes -- fibromyalgia -- irritable bowel syndrome -- BDD = bodily distress disorder -- DSM = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders -- HrQoL = health-related quality of life -- IBS = irritable bowel syndrome -- IMMPACT = Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials -- NRS = numeric rating scale -- SSD = somatic symptom disorder
Medicine, Psychosomatic -- Periodicals
616.0805 - Journal URLs:
- http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=N&PAGE=toc&SEARCH=00006842-000000000-00000.kc&LINKTYPE=asBody&LINKPOS=32&D=ovft ↗
http://www.psychosomaticmedicine.org ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000502 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0033-3174
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6946.555000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 6069.xml