Gender and Status Offending: Judicial Paternalism in Juvenile Justice Processing. (July 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Spivak, Andrew L.; Wagner, Brooke M.; Whitmer, Jennifer M.; Charish, Courtney L.
• Is Part Of: Feminist criminology. Volume 9:Number 3(2014:Jul.)
• Page Start: 224
• Page End: 248
• Publication Date: 2014-07
• Subjects: female delinquency -- juvenile delinquency -- juvenile justice -- courts -- judges; Feminist criminology -- Periodicals; Female offenders -- Periodicals; 364.37405
• DOI: 10.1177/1557085114531318
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1557-0851

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between gender and juvenile justice processing outcomes for status offenders. The feminist criminological concept of judicial paternalism suggests that official justice systems, as gendered institutions with traditional patriarchal norms, will treat delinquent girls differently than delinquent boys. This paternalistic effect should be especially prevalent for status offenses, which are used to enforce institutional (parental, school, civic, parochial) authority. Using 1999-2001 juvenile processing data for 3, 329 status offense referrals to the Oklahoma Office of Juvenile Affairs ( N = 3, 329) and controlling for age, race, prior history, type of status offense, and measures of social class and urban environment, our results indicate that (a) girls outnumber boys among status offenders, (b) girls are more likely than boys to have their petitions filed for review, (c) girls are less likely than boys to be adjudicated guilty, and (d) girls are just as likely as boys to receive an incarcerated custody sentence as opposed to probation. We argue that these results illustrate the manifestation of the juvenile justice system as a gendered institution in which the adjudication of status offenders reflects judicial paternalism.