Using the EZ-diffusion model to score a Single-Category Implicit Association Test of physical activity. (March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rebar, Amanda L.; Ram, Nilam; Conroy, David E.
• Is Part Of: Psychology of sport and exercise. Volume 16:Part 3 (2015:Jan.)
• Page Start: 96
• Page End: 105
• Publication Date: 2015-03
• Subjects: Automatic evaluations -- Response time measures -- Exercise -- Implicit attitudes; Sports -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; Exercise -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; Psychology -- Periodicals; Sports -- Periodicals; Exercise -- Periodicals; Societies, Medical -- Periodicals; Psychology; Sports; Exercise; Societies, Medical; Sports -- Aspect psychologique -- Périodiques; Exercice -- Aspect psychologique -- Périodiques; 613.71019
• DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.09.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1469-0292

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: The Single-Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) has been used as a method for assessing automatic evaluations of physical activity, but measurement artifact or consciously-held attitudes could be confounding the outcome scores of these measures. The objective of these two studies was to address these measurement concerns by testing the validity of a novel SC-IAT scoring technique. Design: Study 1 was a cross-sectional study, and study 2 was a prospective study. Method: In study 1, undergraduate students ( N = 104) completed SC-IATs for physical activity, flowers, and sedentary behavior. In study 2, undergraduate students ( N = 91) completed a SC-IAT for physical activity, self-reported affective and instrumental attitudes toward physical activity, physical activity intentions, and wore an accelerometer for two weeks. The EZ-diffusion model was used to decompose the SC-IAT into three process component scores including the information processing efficiency score. Results: In study 1, a series of structural equation model comparisons revealed that the information processing score did not share variability across distinct SC-IATs, suggesting it does not represent systematic measurement artifact. In study 2, the information processing efficiency score was shown to be unrelated to self-reported affective and instrumental attitudes toward physical activity, and positively related to physical activity behavior, above and beyond the traditional D -score of the SC-IAT. Conclusions: The information processing efficiency score is a valid measure of automatic evaluations of physical activity. Highlights: We use the EZ-diffusion model to score a Single-Category Implicit Association Test. The new score does not represent measurement artifact. The new score is distinct from controlled evaluations of physical activity. The new score relates to unintentional physical activity more so than the D -score. This novel score is a valid measure of automatic evaluations of physical activity.