Risk Factors for Reoperation in Patients Treated Surgically for Lumbar Stenosis: A Subanalysis of the 8-year Data From the SPORT Trial. Issue 10 (May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gerling, Michael C.; Leven, Dante; Passias, Peter G.; Lafage, Virginie; Bianco, Kristina; Lee, Alexandra; Lurie, Jon D.; Tosteson, Tor D.; Zhao, Wenyan; Spratt, Kevin F.; Radcliff, Kristen; Errico, Thomas J.
• Is Part Of: Spine. Volume 41:Issue 10(2016)
• Publication Date: 2016-05
• Subjects: lumbar spine -- patient outcomes -- reoperation -- risk factors -- spinal stenosis -- spine surgery -- treatment effect; Spine -- Abnormalities -- Periodicals; Spine -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Spine -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 616.73005
• DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001361
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0362-2436

Abstract

Abstract : Study Design: A retrospective subgroup analysis was performed on surgically treated patients from the lumbar spinal stenosis (SpS) arm of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT), randomized, and observational cohorts. Objective: To identify risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for SpS and compare outcomes between patients who underwent reoperation with those who did not. Summary of Background Data: SpS is one of the most common indications for surgery in the elderly; however, few long-term studies have identified risk factors for reoperation. Methods: A post-hoc subgroup analysis was performed on patients from the SpS arm of the SPORT, randomized and observational cohorts. Baseline characteristics were analyzed between reoperation and no-reoperation groups using univariate and multivariate analysis on data 8 years postoperation. Results: Of the 417 study patients, 88% underwent decompression only, 5% noninstrumented fusion, and 6% instrumented fusion. At the 8-year follow-up, the reoperation rate was 18%; 52% of reoperations were for recurrent stenosis or progressive spondylolisthesis, 25% for complication or other reason, and 16% for new condition. Of patients who underwent a reoperation, 42% did so within 2 years, 70% within 4 years, and 84% within 6 years. Patients who underwent reoperation were less likely to have presented with any neurological deficit (43% reop vs . 57% no reop, P = 0.04). Patients improved less at follow-up in the reoperation group ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: In patients undergoing surgical treatment for SpS, the reoperation rate at 8-year follow-up was 18%. Patients with a reoperation were less likely to have a baseline neurological deficit. Patients who did not undergo reoperation had better patient reported outcomes at 8-year follow-up compared with those who had repeat surgery. Level of Evidence: 2