Concurrent Involved-field Radiotherapy and XELOX Versus XELOX Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer Patients With Postoperative Locoregional Recurrence. (April 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Concurrent Involved-field Radiotherapy and XELOX Versus XELOX Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer Patients With Postoperative Locoregional Recurrence. (April 2015)
- Main Title:
- Concurrent Involved-field Radiotherapy and XELOX Versus XELOX Chemotherapy Alone in Gastric Cancer Patients With Postoperative Locoregional Recurrence
- Authors:
- Yuan, Shuanghu (Tiger)
Wang, Fu-Li
Liu, Ning
Liu, Yu-Hui
Liu, Shu-Guang
Huang, Yong
Li, Yong-Qing
Liu, Xi-Bin
Zhang, Yi
Li, Wan-Hu
Yu, Jinming
Zhang, Jian-Dong - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: To compare the treatment outcomes of concurrent involved-field radiotherapy and XELOX (oxaliplatin and capecitabine) versus XELOX chemotherapy alone in gastric adenocarcinoma patients with locoregional recurrence. Materials and Methods: From 2004 to 2008, 79 patients with recurrent locoregional gastric cancer after curative resection of gastric tumor were enrolled. Among them, 41 patients received involved-field radiotherapy (median dose 50 Gy) by a 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique and concurrent XELOX chemotherapy, and 38 patients were treated with XELOX chemotherapy alone (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2, capecitabine 1000 mg/m 2, twice daily, 3 wk each cycle). Results: The concurrent radiochemotherapy group showed better overall response (including complete response and partial response) when compared with the chemotherapy group (87.8% vs. 63.0%, P =0.01). The control rates for pain, bleeding, and dysphagia/obstruction were 89.5% (17/19), 81.8% (9/11), and 80% (8/10), respectively, in the radiochemotherapy group and 58.8% (10/17), 50% (5/10), and 57.1% (4/7), respectively, in the chemotherapy group. The concurrent radiochemotherapy group showed better overall symptom-control rate when compared with the chemotherapy group (55.9% vs. 85%, P =0.006). Patients receiving concurrent radiochemotherapy trended toward a better median overall survival when compared with those receiving chemotherapy alone (13.4 vs. 5.4 mo, P =0.06). In addition, there wereAbstract : Purpose: To compare the treatment outcomes of concurrent involved-field radiotherapy and XELOX (oxaliplatin and capecitabine) versus XELOX chemotherapy alone in gastric adenocarcinoma patients with locoregional recurrence. Materials and Methods: From 2004 to 2008, 79 patients with recurrent locoregional gastric cancer after curative resection of gastric tumor were enrolled. Among them, 41 patients received involved-field radiotherapy (median dose 50 Gy) by a 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique and concurrent XELOX chemotherapy, and 38 patients were treated with XELOX chemotherapy alone (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2, capecitabine 1000 mg/m 2, twice daily, 3 wk each cycle). Results: The concurrent radiochemotherapy group showed better overall response (including complete response and partial response) when compared with the chemotherapy group (87.8% vs. 63.0%, P =0.01). The control rates for pain, bleeding, and dysphagia/obstruction were 89.5% (17/19), 81.8% (9/11), and 80% (8/10), respectively, in the radiochemotherapy group and 58.8% (10/17), 50% (5/10), and 57.1% (4/7), respectively, in the chemotherapy group. The concurrent radiochemotherapy group showed better overall symptom-control rate when compared with the chemotherapy group (55.9% vs. 85%, P =0.006). Patients receiving concurrent radiochemotherapy trended toward a better median overall survival when compared with those receiving chemotherapy alone (13.4 vs. 5.4 mo, P =0.06). In addition, there were no significant differences in the rates of toxicity or adverse reactions between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Concurrent involved-field radiotherapy and XELOX showed better responses and overall symptom-control rates compared with XELOX chemotherapy alone in gastric cancer patients with postoperative locoregional recurrence. A trend of survival benefit from radiochemotherapy was also observed but needs to be further explored. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- American journal of clinical oncology. Volume 38:Number 2(2015)
- Journal:
- American journal of clinical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 38:Number 2(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 38, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 38
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0038-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-04
- Subjects:
- radiochemotherapy -- chemotherapy -- gastric carcinoma -- locoregional recurrence
Cancer -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Oncology -- Periodicals
Tumors -- Periodicals
616.994005 - Journal URLs:
- http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=toc&D=yrovft&AN=00000421-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.amjclinicaloncology.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/COC.0b013e31828f5cb6 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0277-3732
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0823.500000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 6031.xml