Injury risk functions based on population-based finite element model responses: Application to femurs under dynamic three-point bending. (28th February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Park, Gwansik; Forman, Jason; Kim, Taewung; Panzer, Matthew B.; Crandall, Jeff R.
• Is Part Of: Traffic injury prevention. Volume 19(2018)Supplement 1
• Page Start: S59
• Page End: S64
• Publication Date: 2018-02-28
• Subjects: Injury risk function -- statistical shape analysis -- statistical finite element analysis -- population finite element models -- Monte Carlo analysis -- femur; Traffic safety -- Periodicals; Traffic accidents -- Periodicals; Wounds and injuries -- Prevention -- Periodicals; 363.125
• DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1398402
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1538-9588

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objective : The goal of this study was to explore a framework for developing injury risk functions (IRFs) in a bottom-up approach based on responses of parametrically variable finite element (FE) models representing exemplar populations. Methods: First, a parametric femur modeling tool was developed and validated using a subject-specific (SS)-FE modeling approach. Second, principal component analysis and regression were used to identify parametric geometric descriptors of the human femur and the distribution of those factors for 3 target occupant sizes (5th, 50th, and 95th percentile males). Third, distributions of material parameters of cortical bone were obtained from the literature for 3 target occupant ages (25, 50, and 75 years) using regression analysis. A Monte Carlo method was then implemented to generate populations of FE models of the femur for target occupants, using a parametric femur modeling tool. Simulations were conducted with each of these models under 3-point dynamic bending. Finally, model-based IRFs were developed using logistic regression analysis, based on the moment at fracture observed in the FE simulation. In total, 100 femur FE models incorporating the variation in the population of interest were generated, and 500, 000 moments at fracture were observed (applying 5, 000 ultimate strains for each synthesized 100 femur FE models) for each target occupant characteristics. Results : Using the proposed framework on this study, the model-based IRFs for 3 target male occupant sizes (5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles) and ages (25, 50, and 75 years) were developed. The model-based IRF was located in the 95% confidence interval of the test-based IRF for the range of 15 to 70% injury risks. The 95% confidence interval of the developed IRF was almost in line with the mean curve due to a large number of data points. Conclusions : The framework proposed in this study would be beneficial for developing the IRFs in a bottom-up manner, whose range of variabilities is informed by the population-based FE model responses. Specifically, this method mitigates the uncertainties in applying empirical scaling and may improve IRF fidelity when a limited number of experimental specimens are available.