Spatial, biogeographic and environmental predictors of diversity in Amazonian Zygoptera. Issue 2 (11th September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Brasil, Leandro S.; Oliveira‐Júnior, José M.; Calvão, Lenize B.; Carvalho, Fernando G.; Monteiro‐Júnior, Claudio S.; Dias‐Silva, Karina; Juen, Leandro
• Editors: Hassall, Christopher; Sahlen, Göran
• Is Part Of: Insect conservation and diversity. Volume 11:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 174
• Page End: 184
• Publication Date: 2017-09-11
• Subjects: Amazonian diversity -- area of endemism -- beta diversity -- species turnover; Entomology -- Periodicals; Insects -- Conservation -- Periodicals; Biodiversity -- Periodicals; Insects -- Ecology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 333.955716
• DOI: 10.1111/icad.12262
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1752-458X

Abstract

Abstract: Our objectives were to assess how turnover and nestedness contribute to beta‐diversity patterns of the Zygoptera in Amazonian streams, and to relate these components of beta diversity to environmental, spatial and biogeographic predictors. Our first hypothesis is that the turnover is the most important component of beta‐diversity patterns due to the historical isolation of all or part of the areas located in the interfluves of the major Amazonian rivers. Our second hypothesis is that the interaction between environmental conditions and the area of endemism (biogeography) would be the most important predictor of beta‐diversity patterns. To test these hypotheses, we compiled data on the Zygoptera communities from 172 Amazonian streams. We used three sets of predictor variables: (i) environmental variables, (ii) area of endemism (biogeographic) and (iii) spatial filters. The turnover explained 99.36% of the beta diversity, corroborating our first hypothesis. Together, environmental and biogeographic variables were the best predictors of beta‐diversity patterns. For turnover, however, the biogeographic variables were the best predictors, contrary to our second hypothesis. We found high gamma diversity, but low alpha diversity in the Zygoptera communities. This paradox is explained by the high turnover among sites within the study landscape. This pattern of diversity is related to both historical biogeographic factors and the spatial structuring of environmental conditions in the Amazon region. In the light of our results (high turnover and beta diversity), and their correspondence with areas of endemism, adequate conservation of Amazonian Zygoptera diversity will depend on the establishment of so‐called mega‐reserves throughout the major Amazonian interfluves and, whenever possible, in the areas with adequate environmental conditions for the greatest possible number of species, otherwise, most species may be at a constant risk of extinction.