Primary Closure Versus Biliary Drainage After Laparoscopic Choledocotomy: Results of a Comparative Study. Issue 1 (February 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Primary Closure Versus Biliary Drainage After Laparoscopic Choledocotomy: Results of a Comparative Study. Issue 1 (February 2016)
- Main Title:
- Primary Closure Versus Biliary Drainage After Laparoscopic Choledocotomy
- Authors:
- Audouy, Cyril
Thereaux, Jérémie
Kansou, Gaby
Leroux, Geoffroy
Badic, Bogdan
Bail, Jean P. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of primary closure (PC) and biliary drainage (BD), after the laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones by choledocotomy. Patients and Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2014, 102 patients underwent laparoscopy for lithiasis of the CBD. Intraoperative cholangiography was systematically performed, followed by choledocoscopy, depending on the size of the CBD. Results: Eighty (78.4%) of the 102 patients underwent laparoscopic stone extraction by choledocotomy, and were assigned to 2 groups: PC (group A, n=25), and BD (group B, n=55). Groups A and B were comparable in terms of age (62.3±26.1 vs. 66.0±19.3 y; P =0.53), the percentage of women (72.0% vs. 76.4%; P =0.68), body mass index (25.9±6.1 vs. 26.9±4.4 kg/m 2 ; P =0.52), and CBD diameter (11.6±3.1 vs. 12.1±3.8 mm; P =0.59). The mean durations of surgery and of hospital stay were significantly shorter in group A: 179±38 versus 211±57 minutes ( P =0.02) and 5.4±2.0 versus 8.4±3.2 days ( P <0.001). Groups A and B were comparable in terms of serious postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo scores of 3, 4, and 5): 2 versus 4 ( P =1). In group B, bile drain removal was complicated by choleperitoneum in 3 cases. Conclusions: With shorter durations of surgery and hospital stay, equivalent postoperative morbi-mortality, and an absence of the specific morbidity due to bile drainage, PC may be considered a safe and feasible optionAbstract : Introduction: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of primary closure (PC) and biliary drainage (BD), after the laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones by choledocotomy. Patients and Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2014, 102 patients underwent laparoscopy for lithiasis of the CBD. Intraoperative cholangiography was systematically performed, followed by choledocoscopy, depending on the size of the CBD. Results: Eighty (78.4%) of the 102 patients underwent laparoscopic stone extraction by choledocotomy, and were assigned to 2 groups: PC (group A, n=25), and BD (group B, n=55). Groups A and B were comparable in terms of age (62.3±26.1 vs. 66.0±19.3 y; P =0.53), the percentage of women (72.0% vs. 76.4%; P =0.68), body mass index (25.9±6.1 vs. 26.9±4.4 kg/m 2 ; P =0.52), and CBD diameter (11.6±3.1 vs. 12.1±3.8 mm; P =0.59). The mean durations of surgery and of hospital stay were significantly shorter in group A: 179±38 versus 211±57 minutes ( P =0.02) and 5.4±2.0 versus 8.4±3.2 days ( P <0.001). Groups A and B were comparable in terms of serious postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo scores of 3, 4, and 5): 2 versus 4 ( P =1). In group B, bile drain removal was complicated by choleperitoneum in 3 cases. Conclusions: With shorter durations of surgery and hospital stay, equivalent postoperative morbi-mortality, and an absence of the specific morbidity due to bile drainage, PC may be considered a safe and feasible option for the laparoscopic management of CBD stones by choledocotomy. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Surgical laparoscopy endoscopy & percutaneous techniques. Volume 26:Issue 1(2016)
- Journal:
- Surgical laparoscopy endoscopy & percutaneous techniques
- Issue:
- Volume 26:Issue 1(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 26, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0026-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-02
- Subjects:
- laparoscopic surgery -- common bile duct stones -- cholecystectomy -- choledocotomy -- T-tube drainage complications
Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Laparoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Endoscopy -- Periodicals
Laparoscopy -- Periodicals
617.550597 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00019509-000000000-00000 ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00129689-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.surgical-laparoscopy.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com/surgical-laparoscopy/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗
http://www.lww.com/Product/1530-4515 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000242 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1530-4515
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8548.234200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5993.xml