Memory in time: Electrophysiological comparison between reality filtering and temporal order judgment. (19th March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liverani, M.C.; Manuel, A.L.; Bouzerda-Wahlen, A.; Genetti, M.; Guggisberg, A.G.; Nahum, L.; Schnider, A.
• Is Part Of: Neuroscience. Volume 289(2015)
• Page Start: 279
• Page End: 288
• Publication Date: 2015-03-19
• Subjects: ANOVA analysis of variance -- DRF distracters within the reality filtering task -- DTJ distracters within the temporal judgment task -- EEG Electroencephalography -- ERPs event-related potentials -- LAURA local auto-regressive average -- ORF orbitofrontal reality filtering -- RF reality filtering -- ROI region of interest -- TANOVA topographic analysis of variance -- TJ temporal judgment -- TOJ temporal order judgment -- TRF targets within the reality filtering task -- TTJ targets within the temporal judgment task; reality filtering -- orbitofrontal cortex -- source memory -- temporal order judgment -- evoked potentials -- time; Neurochemistry -- Periodicals; Neurophysiology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Neurochimie -- Périodiques; Neurophysiologie -- Périodiques; Neurochemistry; Neurophysiology; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.12.064
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0306-4522

Abstract

Highlights: Orbitofrontal reality filtering (ORF) allows to sense if memories pertain to reality. Temporal order judgment (TOJ) allows to place memories in the correct temporal frame. We compared ORF and TOJ in the same paradigm and within a comparable time frame. The two processes dissociate at the behavioral and electrophysiological levels. ORF and TOJ are two distinct time processing mechanisms in memory. Abstract: Orbitofrontal reality filtering (ORF) denotes a little known but vital memory control mechanism, expressed at 200–300 ms after stimulus presentation, that allows one to sense whether evoked memories (thoughts) refer to present reality and can be acted upon, or not. Its failure induces reality confusion evident in confabulations that patients act upon and disorientation. In what way ORF differs from temporal order judgment (TOJ), that is, the conscious knowledge about when something happened in the past, has never been explored. Here we used evoked potential analysis to compare ORF and TOJ within a combined experimental task and within a comparable time frame, close to the experienced present. Seventeen healthy human subjects performed an experiment using continuous recognition tasks that combined the challenges of ORF and TOJ. We found that the two mechanisms dissociated behaviorally: subjects were markedly slower and less accurate in TOJ than ORF. Both mechanisms evoked similar potentials at 240–280 ms, when ORF normally occurs. However, they rapidly dissociated in terms of amplitude differences and electrical source from 310 to 360 ms and again from 530 to 560 ms. We conclude that the task of consciously ordering memories in the immediate past (TOJ) is effortful and slow in contrast to sensing memories' relation with the present (ORF). Both functions invoke similar early electrocortical processes which then rapidly dissociate and engage different brain areas. The results are consistent with the different consequences of the two mechanisms' dysfunction: while failure of ORF has a known clinical manifestation (reality confusion as evident in confabulation and disorientation), the failure of TOJ, as tested here, has no such known clinical correlate.