Frequency and phase correction for multiplexed edited MRS of GABA and glutathione. Issue 1 (7th December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mikkelsen, Mark; Saleh, Muhammad G.; Near, Jamie; Chan, Kimberly L.; Gong, Tao; Harris, Ashley D.; Oeltzschner, Georg; Puts, Nicolaas A.J.; Cecil, Kim M.; Wilkinson, Iain D.; Edden, Richard A.E.
• Is Part Of: Magnetic resonance in medicine. Volume 80:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: 21
• Page End: 28
• Publication Date: 2017-12-07
• Subjects: frequency/phase correction -- GABA -- GSH -- HERMES -- MRS -- spectral registration; Nuclear magnetic resonance -- Periodicals; Electron paramagnetic resonance -- Periodicals; 616.07548
• DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27027
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0740-3194

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Detection of endogenous metabolites using multiplexed editing substantially improves the efficiency of edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Multiplexed editing (i.e., performing more than one edited experiment in a single acquisition) requires a tailored, robust approach for correction of frequency and phase offsets. Here, a novel method for frequency and phase correction (FPC) based on spectral registration is presented and compared against previously presented approaches. Methods: One simulated dataset and 40 γ‐aminobutyric acid‐/glutathione‐edited HERMES datasets acquired in vivo at three imaging centers were used to test four FPC approaches: no correction; spectral registration; spectral registration with post hoc choline‐creatine alignment; and multistep FPC. The performance of each routine for the simulated dataset was assessed by comparing the estimated frequency/phase offsets against the known values, whereas the performance for the in vivo data was assessed quantitatively by calculation of an alignment quality metric based on choline subtraction artifacts. Results: The multistep FPC approach returned corrections that were closest to the true values for the simulated dataset. Alignment quality scores were on average worst for no correction, and best for multistep FPC in both the γ‐aminobutyric acid‐ and glutathione‐edited spectra in the in vivo data. Conclusions: Multistep FPC results in improved correction of frequency/phase errors in multiplexed γ‐aminobutyric acid‐/glutathione‐edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy experiments. The optimal FPC strategy is experiment‐specific, and may even be dataset‐specific. Magn Reson Med 80:21–28, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.