Validating a single-question depression measure among older adults. (20th September 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Validating a single-question depression measure among older adults. (20th September 2017)
- Main Title:
- Validating a single-question depression measure among older adults
- Authors:
- Min, Kyung-Duk
Chun, Heeran
Kim, Il-Ho
Cho, Sung-il - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: Background: A single-item depression measure may not be adequate in capturing the complex entity of mental health, despite wide use of this indicator in community studies. This study evaluated the accuracy of a single-question depression measure in comparison to two composite indices–the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Materials and methods: A total of 800 elderly participants ranging from 60 to 89 years of age and residing in Seoul were recruited using a multistage sampling scheme in 2015. The survey was conducted by trained interviewers with a constructed questionnaire. Reliability and validity measures such as the Kappa index, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC were used to evaluate the accuracy of the single question measure. Socio-demographic group differences in accuracy were compared by age, sex, marital status, education, employment, and financial status. Results: The prevalence of depression by a single-question measure was much lower than those of CESD and GDS (5.5%, 12.3%, and 12.1%, respectively). The sensitivity of the single-item measure, based on CESD and GDS, was extremely low at 30.6% and 36.1%. In the subgroup analysis, however, there was a marked educational discrepancy in all accuracy measures; in sensitivity, people with a university degree or higher showed about 2.4 times higher sensitivity than those having only a primary school education. Conclusions: The resultsABSTRACT: Background: A single-item depression measure may not be adequate in capturing the complex entity of mental health, despite wide use of this indicator in community studies. This study evaluated the accuracy of a single-question depression measure in comparison to two composite indices–the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Materials and methods: A total of 800 elderly participants ranging from 60 to 89 years of age and residing in Seoul were recruited using a multistage sampling scheme in 2015. The survey was conducted by trained interviewers with a constructed questionnaire. Reliability and validity measures such as the Kappa index, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC were used to evaluate the accuracy of the single question measure. Socio-demographic group differences in accuracy were compared by age, sex, marital status, education, employment, and financial status. Results: The prevalence of depression by a single-question measure was much lower than those of CESD and GDS (5.5%, 12.3%, and 12.1%, respectively). The sensitivity of the single-item measure, based on CESD and GDS, was extremely low at 30.6% and 36.1%. In the subgroup analysis, however, there was a marked educational discrepancy in all accuracy measures; in sensitivity, people with a university degree or higher showed about 2.4 times higher sensitivity than those having only a primary school education. Conclusions: The results show that a single-question depression measure should be used with caution. In addition, the single-question measure could substantially underestimate depression among the risk group of older adults. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International psychogeriatrics. Volume 30:Number 1(2018)
- Journal:
- International psychogeriatrics
- Issue:
- Volume 30:Number 1(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 30, Issue 1 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 30
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0030-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 69
- Page End:
- 76
- Publication Date:
- 2017-09-20
- Subjects:
- depression measure, -- single question, -- composite index, -- accuracy
Geriatric psychiatry -- Periodicals
618.9768905 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.cambridge.org ↗
http://titles.cambridge.org/journals/journal_catalogue.asp?mnemonic=ipg ↗
http://www.journals.cup.org/owadba/owa/issuesinjournal?jid=IPG ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1017/S1041610217001673 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1041-6102
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 5956.xml