Natural history of 'second' biochemical failure after salvage radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a multi‐institution study. (5th July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tumati, Vasu; Jackson, William C.; Abugharib, Ahmed E.; Raj, Ganesh; Roehrborn, Claus; Lotan, Yair; Courtney, Kevin; Bagrodia, Aditya; Gahan, Jeffrey C.; Zumsteg, Zachary S.; Folkert, Michael R.; Laine, Aaron M.; Hannan, Raquibul; Spratt, Daniel E.; Desai, Neil B.
• Is Part Of: BJU international. Volume 121:Number 3(2018)
• Page Start: 365
• Page End: 372
• Publication Date: 2017-07-05
• Subjects: prostate cancer -- salvage radiation -- radical prostatectomy -- natural history -- biochemical failure; Genitourinary organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Genitourinary organs -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Urology -- Periodicals; 616.6
• DOI: 10.1111/bju.13926
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1464-4096

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To describe the natural history of prostate cancer in men who experience a second biochemical recurrence (BCR) after salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after prostatectomy. Patients and Methods: After undergoing SRT at one of two institutions between 1986 and 2013, 286 patients experienced a second BCR, defined as two rises in prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) of ≥0.2 ng/mL above nadir. Event rates for distant metastasis (DM) or freedom from DM (FFDM), castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), prostate cancer‐specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression was used for comparative analyses. Results: At a median of 6.1 years after second BCR, DM, CRPC, PCSS and OS rates were 41%, 27%, 83% and 73%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, interval to second BCR <1 year (hazard ratio [HR] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71–4.14; P < 0.001], Gleason score 8–10 (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.07–2.54; P = 0.022), and concurrent ADT during SRT (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.08–2.88; P = 0.024) were associated with FFDM, while PCSS was associated with interval to second BCR <1 year (HR 3.00, 95% CI 1.69–5.32; P < 0.001) and concurrent ADT during SRT (HR 2.15, CI 1.13–4.08; P = 0.019). These risk factors were used to stratify patients into three groups, with 6‐year FFDM rates of 71%, 59% and 33%, and PCSS rates of 89%, 79%, and 65%, respectively. Conclusion: Following second BCR after SRT, clinical progression is enriched in a subgroup of patients with prostate cancer, while others remain without DM for long intervals. Stratifying patients into risk groups using prognostic factors may aid counselling and future trial design.