Use of short-term breath measures to estimate daily methane production by cattle. (25th August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Velazco, J. I.; Mayer, D. G.; Zimmerman, S.; Hegarty, R. S.
• Is Part Of: Animal. Volume 10:Number 1(2016:Jan.)
• Page Start: 25
• Page End: 33
• Publication Date: 2015-08-25
• Subjects: methane, -- cattle, -- measurement, -- greenhouse gases; Animal breeding -- Periodicals; Animal genetics -- Periodicals; Animal nutrition -- Periodicals; Animal physiology -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; 636.005
• DOI: 10.1017/S1751731115001603
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1751-7311

Abstract

Abstract : Methods to measure enteric methane (CH4 ) emissions from individual ruminants in their production environment are required to validate emission inventories and verify mitigation claims. Estimates of daily methane production (DMP) based on consolidated short-term emission measurements are developing, but method verification is required. Two cattle experiments were undertaken to test the hypothesis that DMP estimated by averaging multiple short-term breath measures of methane emission rate did not differ from DMP measured in respiration chambers (RC). Short-term emission rates were obtained from a GreenFeed Emissions Monitoring (GEM) unit, which measured emission rate while cattle consumed a dispensed supplement. In experiment 1 (Expt. 1), four non-lactating cattle (LW=518 kg) were adapted for 18 days then measured for six consecutive periods. Each period consisted of 2 days of ad libitum intake and GEM emission measurement followed by 1 day in the RC. A prototype GEM unit releasing water as an attractant (GEM water) was also evaluated in Expt. 1. Experiment 2 (Expt. 2) was a larger study based on similar design with 10 cattle (LW=365 kg), adapted for 21 days and GEM measurement was extended to 3 days in each of the six periods. In Expt. 1, there was no difference in DMP estimated by the GEM unit relative to the RC (209.7 v . 215.1 g CH4 /day) and no difference between these methods in methane yield (MY, 22.7 v . 23.7 g CH4 /kg of dry matter intake, DMI). In Expt. 2, the correlation between GEM and RC measures of DMP and MY were assessed using 95% confidence intervals, with no difference in DMP or MY between methods and high correlations between GEM and RC measures for DMP ( r =0.85; 215 v . 198 g CH4 /day SEM=3.0) and for MY ( r =0.60; 23.8 v . 22.1 g CH4 /kg DMI SEM=0.42). When data from both experiments was combined neither DMP nor MY differed between GEM- and RC-based measures ( P> 0.05). GEM water-based estimates of DMP and MY were lower than RC and GEM ( P< 0.05). Cattle accessed the GEM water unit with similar frequency to the GEM unit (2.8 v . 3.5 times/day, respectively) but eructation frequency was reduced from 1.31 times/min (GEM) to once every 2.6 min (GEM water). These studies confirm the hypothesis that DMP estimated by averaging multiple short-term breath measures of methane emission rate using GEM does not differ from measures of DMP obtained from RCs. Further, combining many short-term measures of methane production rate during supplement consumption provides an estimate of DMP, which can be usefully applied in estimating MY.