And now for something completely different. Issue 1 (20th November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Broadribb, Michael P.
• Is Part Of: Process safety progress. Volume 37:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: 25
• Page End: 30
• Publication Date: 2017-11-20
• Subjects: process safety management -- risk based process safety; Chemical plants -- Management -- Periodicals; 660
• DOI: 10.1002/prs.11943
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1066-8527

Abstract

Abstract : Process safety management systems are generally credited with reducing major accident risk in the process industries. While those systems have been around for many years—the EU introduced the Seveso Directive in 1982, and US OSHA promulgated the PSM regulation 10 years later— many companies today are challenged by inadequate and/or stagnant process safety management system performance. Several companies have experienced major incidents, particularly when they are subject to prescriptive regulations such as OSHA PSM. Reliance on compliance with prescriptive regulations is no guarantee of preventing major incidents. No regulator anywhere has ever thought of everything that can cause a process safety incident and then written a regulation to safeguard against that occurrence. Good process safety requires that hazards are identified, the risks of these hazards are understood, and those risks are managed by "doing the right thing." This frequently requires additional activities that go beyond regulatory compliance. In 2007, CCPS introduced Risk Based Process Safety (RBPS), which builds on lessons learned since the early 1980s, and applies management system principles of Plan, Do, Check, Act. Being risk‐based, RBPS is not prescriptive. It recognizes that all hazards and risks are NOT equal, and focuses more resources on the higher hazards and risks that have been identified. This enables finite company resources to be optimally deployed to efficiently improve process safety performance. The 20 elements of RBPS go beyond OSHA PSM to include other elements, such as risk analysis and performance metrics. Some companies have embraced RBPS and moved away from compliance‐driven process safety management systems. However, RBPS is primarily focused on process plant operations. While some elements of RBPS can be applied to large and small projects, RBPS and its guidance does not comprehensively address projects or certain other aspects of process safety. The paper highlights "some completely different" process safety elements for which no RBPS guidance is currently available, and discusses the application of a more comprehensive RBPS approach to fill these gaps. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Process Saf Prog 37:25–30, 2018