Del Nido cardioplegia for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Issue 2 (19th February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Koeckert, Michael S.; Smith, Deane E.; Vining, Patrick F.; Ranganath, Neel K.; Beaulieu, Thomas; Loulmet, Didier F.; Zias, Elias; Galloway, Aubrey C.; Grossi, Eugene A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of cardiac surgery. Volume 33:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 64
• Page End: 68
• Publication Date: 2018-02-19
• Subjects: aortic valve replacement -- cardioplegia -- minimally invasive; Heart -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.412005
• DOI: 10.1111/jocs.13536
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0886-0440

Abstract

Abstract: Background: We analyzed the impact and safety of del Nido Cardioplegia (DNC) in patients undergoing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR). Methods: We analyzed all isolated MIAVR replacements from 5/2013‐6/2015 excluding re‐operative patients. The approach was a hemi‐median sternotomy in all patients. Patients were divided into two cohorts, those who received 4:1 crystalloid:blood DNC solution and those in whom standard 1:4 Buckberg‐based cardioplegia (WBC) was used. One‐to‐one propensity case matching of DNC to WBC was performed based on standard risk factors and differences between groups were analyzed using chi‐square and non‐parametric methods. Results: MIAVR was performed in 181 patients; DNC was used in 59 and WBC in 122. Case matching resulted in 59 patients per cohort. DNC was associated with reduced re‐dosing (5/59 (8.5%) versus 39/59 (61.0%), P < 0.001) and less total cardioplegia volume (1290 ± 347 mL vs 2284 ± 828 mL, P < 0.001). Antegrade cardioplegia alone was used in 89.8% (53/59) of DNC patients versus 33.9% (20/59) of WBC patients ( P < 0.001). Median bypass and aortic cross‐clamp times were similar. Clinical outcomes were similar with respect to post‐operative hematocrit, transfusion requirements, need for inotropic/pressor support, duration of intensive care unit stay, re‐intubation, length of stay, new onset atrial fibrillation, and mortality. Conclusions: Del Nido cardioplegia usage during MIAVR minimized re‐dosing and the need for retrograde delivery. Patient safety was not compromised with this technique in this group of low‐risk patients undergoing MIAVR.