Emotions and assessment: considerations for rater‐based judgements of entrustment. Issue 3 (9th November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gomez‐Garibello, Carlos; Young, Meredith
• Is Part Of: Medical education. Volume 52:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 254
• Page End: 262
• Publication Date: 2017-11-09
• Subjects: Medical education -- Periodicals; Medical education -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 610.7
• DOI: 10.1111/medu.13476
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0308-0110

Abstract

Abstract : Context: Assessment is subject to increasing scrutiny as medical education transitions towards a competency‐based medical education (CBME) model. Traditional perspectives on the roles of assessment emphasise high‐stakes, summative assessment, whereas CBME argues for formative assessment. Revisiting conceptualisations about the roles and formats of assessment in medical education provides opportunities to examine understandings and expectations of the assessment of learners. The act of the rater generating scores might be considered as an exclusively cognitive exercise; however, current literature has drawn attention to the notion of raters as measurement instruments, thereby attributing additional factors to their decision‐making processes, such as social considerations and intuition. However, the literature has not comprehensively examined the influence of raters' emotions during assessment. In this narrative review, we explore the influence of raters' emotions in the assessment of learners. Methods: We summarise existing literature that describes the role of emotions in assessment broadly, and rater‐based assessment specifically, across a variety of fields. The literature related to emotions and assessment is examined from different perspectives, including those of educational context, decision making and rater cognition. We use the concept of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) to contextualise a discussion of the ways in which raters' emotions may have meaningful impacts on the decisions they make in clinical settings. This review summarises findings from different perspectives and identifies areas for consideration for the role of emotion in rater‐based assessment, and areas for future research. Conclusions: We identify and discuss three different interpretations of the influence of raters' emotions during assessments: (i) emotions lead to biased decision making; (ii) emotions contribute random noise to assessment, and (iii) emotions constitute legitimate sources of information that contribute to assessment decisions. We discuss these three interpretations in terms of areas for future research and implications for assessment. Abstract : The authors discuss the importance of considering raters' emotions in assessment and entrustment of learners in workplace based settings.