Assessment of hydrogels for bioprinting of endothelial cells. Issue 4 (29th November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Benning, Leo; Gutzweiler, Ludwig; Tröndle, Kevin; Riba, Julian; Zengerle, Roland; Koltay, Peter; Zimmermann, Stefan; Stark, G. Björn; Finkenzeller, Günter
• Is Part Of: Journal of biomedical materials research. Volume 106:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 935
• Page End: 947
• Publication Date: 2017-11-29
• Subjects: 3D bioprinting -- hydrogel -- endothelial cell -- vascularization -- tissue engineering; Biomedical materials -- Periodicals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36291
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1549-3296

Abstract

Abstract: In tissue engineering applications, vascularization can be accomplished by coimplantation of tissue forming cells and endothelial cells (ECs), whereby the latter are able to form functional blood vessels. The use of three‐dimensional (3D) bioprinting technologies has the potential to improve the classical tissue engineering approach because these will allow the generation of scaffolds with high spatial control of endothelial cell allocation. This study focuses on a side by side comparison of popular commercially available bioprinting hydrogels (Matrigel, fibrin, collagen, gelatin, agarose, Pluronic F‐127, alginate, and alginate/gelatin) in the context of their physicochemical parameters, their swelling/degradation characteristics, their biological effects on vasculogenesis‐related EC parameters and their printability. The aim of this study was to identify the most suitable hydrogel or hydrogel combination for inkjet printing of ECs to build prevascularized tissue constructs. Most tested hydrogels displayed physicochemical characteristics suitable for inkjet printing. However, Pluronic F‐127 and the alginate/gelatin blend were rapidly degraded when incubated in cell culture medium. Agarose, Pluronic F‐127, alginate and alginate/gelatin hydrogels turned out to be unsuitable for bioprinting of ECs because of their non‐adherent properties and/or their incapability to support EC proliferation. Gelatin was able to support EC proliferation and viability but was unable to support endothelial cell sprouting. Our experiments revealed fibrin and collagen to be most suitable for bioprinting of ECs, because these hydrogels showed acceptable swelling/degradation characteristics, supported vasculogenesis‐related EC parameters and showed good printability. Moreover, ECs in constructs of preformed spheroids survived the printing process and formed capillary‐like cords. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 106A: 935–947, 2018.