Working memory capacity and task goals modulate error‐related ERPs. (15th March 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Coleman, James R.; Watson, Jason M.; Strayer, David L.
• Other Names: Karayanidis Frini guestEditor.; Gratton Gabriele guestEditor.; Fabiani Monica guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Psychophysiology. Volume 55:Number 3(2018)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2017-03-15
• Subjects: cognitive control -- error‐related negativity -- individual differences -- post‐error slowing -- working memory capacity; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12805
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0048-5772

Abstract

Abstract: The present study investigated individual differences in information processing following errant behavior. Participants were initially classified as high or as low working memory capacity using the Operation Span Task. In a subsequent session, they then performed a high congruency version of the flanker task under both speed and accuracy stress. We recorded ERPs and behavioral measures of accuracy and response time in the flanker task with a primary focus on processing following an error. The error‐related negativity was larger for the high working memory capacity group than for the low working memory capacity group. The positivity following an error (Pe) was modulated to a greater extent by speed‐accuracy instruction for the high working memory capacity group than for the low working memory capacity group. These data help to explicate the neural bases of individual differences in working memory capacity and cognitive control.