Benjamin Constant and the politics of reason. Issue 2 (17th February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ghins, Arthur
• Is Part Of: History of European ideas. Volume 44:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 224
• Page End: 243
• Publication Date: 2018-02-17
• Subjects: Benjamin Constant -- William Godwin -- Nicolas de Condorcet -- liberalism -- political rationalism; Europe -- Intellectual life -- Periodicals; Europe -- History -- Periodicals; 190.5
• DOI: 10.1080/01916599.2017.1416309
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0191-6599

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This paper makes a claim about Constant's intellectual sources in order to throw additional light on the nature of his liberalism. It assesses Constant's views against the background of a tradition of political rationalism. Constant both criticized and inherited that tradition. This paper shows how this process of critical re-appropriation occurred principally with two figures that had a particular significance for Constant: the very Francophile William Godwin and Nicolas de Condorcet. Constant resisted these authors' desire to replace a consent-based decision-making model by a truth-based decision-making model, and condemned their tendency to enrol individual judgment at the service of a politics of truth. At the same time, Constant did not renounce completely to their dream of bringing certainty into politics. As this double-move shows, it is not clear to what extent Constant succeeded in distancing himself from this tradition of political rationalism in order to establish what I call a rationalist liberalism. This problematic intellectual lineage not only challenges received interpretations of Constant's liberalism either in terms of 'scepticism' or 'pluralism.' It should also invite us to reconsider the widespread idea according to which the French liberal tradition had a common and exclusive source in Montesquieu.