Absolutely tasty: an examination of predicates of personal taste and faultless disagreement. Issue 3 (3rd April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wyatt, Jeremy
• Is Part Of: Inquiry. Volume 61:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 252
• Page End: 280
• Publication Date: 2018-04-03
• Subjects: Predicates of personal taste -- relativism -- contextualism -- faultless disagreement -- absolutism; Philosophy -- Periodicals; Social sciences -- Philosophy -- Periodicals; Philosophy -- Periodicals; Social Sciences -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; Philosophie -- Périodiques; Sciences sociales -- Philosophie -- Périodiques; 105
• DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2017.1402700
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-174X

Abstract

Abstract: Debates about the semantics and pragmatics of predicates of personal taste (PPT) have largely centered on contextualist and relativist proposals. In this paper, I argue in favor of an alternative, absolutist analysis of PPT. Theorists such as Max Kölbel and Peter Lasersohn have argued that we should dismiss absolutism (also called realism or invariantism) due to its inability to accommodate the possibility of faultless disagreement involving PPT. My aim in the paper is to show how the absolutist can in fact accommodate this possibility by drawing on an account of faultless disagreement that improves upon a recent proposal due to Karl Schafer. In amending Schafer's proposal, I put forward an empirically informed view of our beliefs regarding matters of personal taste, as well as an account of our assertions concerning such matters. I also argue that absolutists should take disagreement about these matters to be conative, rather than doxastic, in nature. The anticipated result is an independently compelling account of faultless disagreement about matters of personal taste that fits naturally with absolutism.