How should rural policy be evaluated if it aims to foster community involvement in environmental management?. (February 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Prager, Katrin; Nienaber, Birte; Neumann, Barbara; Phillips, Alistair
• Is Part Of: Journal of rural studies. Volume 37(2015)
• Page Start: 120
• Page End: 131
• Publication Date: 2015-02
• Subjects: Policy evaluation -- Complexity science -- Rural development -- Social capital -- Social-ecological systems -- Community-based environmental management; Sociology, Rural -- Periodicals; Country life -- Periodicals; Rural development -- Periodicals; Land use, Rural -- Planning -- Periodicals; Rural conditions -- Periodicals; Sociologie rurale -- Périodiques; Vie rurale -- Périodiques; Développement rural -- Périodiques; Sol, Utilisation agricole du -- Planification -- Périodiques; Conditions rurales -- Périodiques; Country life; Land use, Rural -- Planning; Rural conditions; Rural development; Sociology, Rural; Periodicals; 307.72
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.12.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0743-0167

Abstract

Abstract: This paper brings together different theoretical perspectives to propose an evaluation framework for policies which have the explicit aim to foster communities' involvement in the management of their natural environment in the context of sustainable rural development, such as the EU LEADER programme, Australia's Caring for Our Country, and UNESCO Biosphere Reserves. Previous policy evaluations have over-simplified the complex social-ecological systems on which these policies are intended to act, have lacked specification of the policy level they address and were predicated on the assumption that policies can be designed to produce predictable outcomes. Based on a concept of 'complex realities' we developed a framework to guide the evaluation of policy effectiveness in social-ecological systems. This comprehensive framework provides the conceptual and theoretical context in which individual evaluation exercises for policy review and future programme design can be embedded. It goes beyond existing frameworks by allowing the identification of factors that explain how and why a policy tool was effective. It provides a structure within which datasets from different sources, relevant stakeholders and relationships can be identified and analysed in a multi-level and multi-scale context. However, we emphasise that policy makers and evaluators' mindsets would have to change to accept uncertainty and the validity of various stakeholders' perceptions and evaluations. Graphical abstract: Evaluation framework for evaluating policies aiming to foster community involvement in environmental management. Highlights: Evaluation of rural community involvement policies needs a comprehensive framework. We propose an evaluation framework based on different theoretical perspectives. The concept of complex realities as guiding principle offers multiple benefits. Genuine community involvement requires participatory evaluation. We progress understanding of policy effectiveness in social-ecological systems.