Dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress symptoms: Support for a hybrid Anhedonia and Externalizing Behaviors model. (February 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Armour, Cherie; Tsai, Jack; Durham, Tory A.; Charak, Ruby; Biehn, Tracey L.; Elhai, Jon D.; Pietrzak, Robert H.
• Is Part Of: Journal of psychiatric research. Volume 61(2015:Feb.)
• Page Start: 106
• Page End: 113
• Publication Date: 2015-02
• Subjects: Posttraumatic stress disorder -- DSM-5 -- 7-Factor hybrid model -- Confirmatory factor analysis -- Latent structure; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; Mental Disorders -- Periodicals; Maladies mentales -- Périodiques; Psychiatry; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.89005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.10.012
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3956

Abstract

Abstract: Several revisions to the symptom clusters of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been made in the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Central to the focus of this study was the revision of PTSD's tripartite structure in DSM-IV into four symptom clusters in DSM-5. Emerging confirmatory factor analytic (CFA) studies have suggested that DSM-5 PTSD symptoms may be best represented by one of two 6-factor models: (1) an Externalizing Behaviors model characterized by a factor which combines the irritability/anger and self-destructive/reckless behavior items; and (2) an Anhedonia model characterized by items of loss of interest, detachment, and restricted affect. The current study conducted CFAs of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms assessed using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) in two independent and diverse trauma-exposed samples of a nationally representative sample of 1484 U.S. veterans and a sample of 497 Midwestern U.S. university undergraduate students. Relative fits of the DSM-5 model, the DSM-5 Dysphoria model, the DSM-5 Dysphoric Arousal model, the two 6-factor models, and a newly proposed 7-factor Hybrid model, which consolidates the two 6-factor models, were evaluated. Results revealed that, in both samples, both 6-factor models provided significantly better fit than the 4-factor DSM-5 model, the DSM-5 Dysphoria model and the DSM-5 Dysphoric Arousal model. Further, the 7-factor Hybrid model, which incorporates key features of both 6-factor models and is comprised of re-experiencing, avoidance, negative affect, anhedonia, externalizing behaviors, and anxious and dysphoric arousal symptom clusters, provided superior fit to the data in both samples. Results are discussed in light of theoretical and empirical support for the latent structure of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms. Highlights: We assessed the relative fit of four competing DSM-5 models of PTSD's latent structure. Of 5-competing models, the current DSM-5 model provides the poorest fit in two diverse trauma-exposed samples. Of the two competing 6-factor models, a recently proposed Anhedonia model provided superior fit. A hybrid 7-factor model which incorporates key features of both 6-factor models provided the best fit overall.