Clinical Evaluation of an Internal Adjustable Retractor in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. (June 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dhumane, Parag; Dallemagne, Bernard; Barry, Brian; Perretta, Silvana; Leroy, Joel; Mutter, Didier; Marescaux, Jacques
• Is Part Of: Surgical innovation. Volume 21:Number 3(2014:Jun.)
• Page Start: 234
• Page End: 239
• Publication Date: 2014-06
• Subjects: biomedical engineering -- ergonomics and/or human factors study -- laparoscopic cholecystectomy -- LESS; Surgery, Operative -- Periodicals; Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals; Laparoscopic surgery -- Periodicals; Surgical Procedures, Operative -- Periodicals; Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive -- Periodicals; Diffusion of Innovation -- Periodicals; Chirurgie opératoire -- Périodiques; Chirurgie endoscopique -- Périodiques; Chirurgie laparoscopique -- Périodiques; 617.91
• DOI: 10.1177/1553350613517945
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1553-3506

Abstract

Introduction . Reducing the number of abdominal incisions in laparoscopic cholecystectomy introduces ergonomic challenges while establishing the critical view during dissection of the triangle of Calot (TC). This study investigates the use of a novel internal retracting device in performing cholecystectomy with a reduced number of ports. Methods . A 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted by 4 surgeons unfamiliar with the novel device. Exposure of the TC was obtained using the internal retractor, which comprises 2 clips, linked by an adjustable thread. One clip is fixed on the gallbladder and the other is fixed to the peritoneum. The endpoint was to evaluate the efficacy and reliability of the device in establishing the critical view of safety. Results . Thirteen patients with a mean body mass index of 25.29 kg/m 2 (standard deviation = 6.24; range = 17.6-36.7 kg/m 2 ) were included in the study. The critical view was obtained in 10 of 13 patients. Application of the device was completed in a median time of 2.25 minutes without injury of the gallbladder or bile leak. Failure occurred in 3 patients, related to wrong manipulation of the device (2 patients), and correct placement of the device but inadequate exposure (1 patient). A conventional 4-port technique was used in these patients. Operators rated their experience with the device as an "easy-to-operate" device with a good safety profile and without any interference with the operative process. Conclusions . Throughout the minimization process specific to minimal access surgery, internal retractors will certainly allow for a reduction in the number of trocars used in laparoscopic procedures.