If International Relations lives on the street, what is it doing in the classroom?. (June 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vale, Peter
• Is Part Of: International relations. Volume 28:Number 2(2014)
• Page Start: 141
• Page End: 158
• Publication Date: 2014-06
• Subjects: E.H. Carr -- language -- site-specificness -- sociology of knowledge -- South Africa -- sovereignty; International relations -- Periodicals; World politics -- Periodicals; 303.482
• DOI: 10.1177/0047117814528347
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0047-1178

Abstract

The argument asserts that International Relations (IR) was (and remains) constructed to serve the interests of the knowledge courts of the north. In South Africa, the discipline is an 'alien species' because the imported idea of sovereignty not only disrupted natural patterns of regional migration, but the formation of the region's first state, the Union of South Africa, divided the country's people on the grounds of race. The coming of the Union followed upon both the Jameson Raid (1895/1896) and the Boer War (1899–1902) – the former was of interest to E.H. Carr in two instances but only as an attempt to explain events in the global north. The 'new' politics of southern Africa, which were based on sovereignty and the rise of Afrikaner Nationalism were ignored by Carr. The migration of IR to South Africa in the 1930s rested in an imperial frame, and the discipline helped create a European state in Africa. The author uses several autobiographical examples to suggest his own dissatisfaction with this condition by using Carr's notion of 'site-specificness'. The primacy of English in IR is critiqued because this language closes off perspectives of the international which are carried in other languages. The article concludes with a discussion of the way in which 'First People' are excluded by the deliberations around IR.