Predicting State-Wide Votes on Ballot Initiatives to Ban Battery Cages and Gestation Crates. (February 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Smithson, Katie; Corbin, Max; Lusk, Jayson L.; Norwood, F. Bailey
• Is Part Of: Journal of agricultural and applied economics. Volume 46:Number 1(2014)
• Page Start: 107
• Page End: 124
• Publication Date: 2014-02
• Subjects: animal welfare, -- battery cage, -- demographics, -- gestation crate, -- state initiative; H7, -- K2, -- Q1; Agriculture -- economics; Agriculture -- Economic aspects -- Periodicals; Agriculture -- Economic aspects -- Southern States -- Periodicals; Agriculture -- Economic aspects -- United States -- Periodicals; Agriculture -- Aspect économique -- Périodiques; Agriculture -- Aspect économique -- États-Unis -- Périodiques; Agrarökonomik; Agrarmarkt; USA; Welt; Agriculture -- Economic aspects; United States; Periodicals; 338.10975
• DOI: 10.1017/S1074070800000663
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1074-0708

Abstract

Abstract : After California voters decided in a state initiative to ban gestation crates and battery cages, some are asking whether other states will host similar initiatives and if they will pass. This study addresses this question by using voting data in California to predict how voters in other states would respond to a similar initiative. Results suggest that a number of states allow such initiatives and possess a demographic profile favorable to the initiative's passage. However, because these states host only a small portion of the livestock population, the impact of such initiatives on the well-being of farm animals is questionable.