Exercise training in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: A randomized controlled pilot study of continuous versus interval training. (15th March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Novaković, Marko; Prokšelj, Katja; Rajkovič, Uroš; Vižintin Cuderman, Tjaša; Janša Trontelj, Katja; Fras, Zlatko; Jug, Borut
• Is Part Of: International journal of cardiology. Volume 255(2018)
• Page Start: 37
• Page End: 44
• Publication Date: 2018-03-15
• Subjects: Tetralogy of Fallot -- Cardiac rehabilitation -- High-intensity interval training -- Exercise test -- Vascular stiffness; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.12.105
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0167-5273

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) have impaired exercise capacity, vascular and cardiac autonomic function, and quality of life (QoL). Specific effects of high-intensity interval or moderate continuous exercise training on these parameters in adults with repaired ToF remain unknown. Methods and results: Thirty adults with repaired ToF were randomized to either high-intensity interval, moderate intensity continuous training (36 sessions, 2–3 times a week) or usual care (no supervised exercise). Exercise capacity, flow-mediated vasodilation, pulse wave velocity, NT-proBNP and fibrinogen levels, heart rate variability and recovery, and QoL (SF-36 questionnaire) were determined at baseline and after the intervention period. Twenty-seven patients (mean age 39 ± 9 years, 63% females, 9 from each group) completed this pilot study. Both training groups improved in at least some parameters of cardiovascular health compared to no exercise. Interval–but not continuous–training improved VO2peak (21.2 to 22.9 ml/kg/min, p = 0.004), flow-mediated vasodilation (8.4 to 12.9%, p = 0.019), pulse wave velocity (5.4 to 4.8 m/s, p = 0.028), NT-proBNP (202 to 190 ng/L, p = 0.032) and fibrinogen levels (2.67 to 2.46 g/L, p = 0.018). Conversely, continuous–but not interval–training improved heart rate variability (low-frequency domain, 0.32 to 0.22, p = 0.039), heart rate recovery after 2 min post-exercise (40 to 47 beats, p = 0.023) and mental domain of SF-36 (87 to 95, p = 0.028). Conclusion: Both interval and continuous exercise training modalities were safe. Interval training seems more efficacious in improving exercise capacity, vascular function, NT-proBNP and fibrinogen levels, while continuous training seems more efficacious in improving cardiac autonomic function and QoL. (Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02643810 ).