Integrating techno-economic, socio-technical and political perspectives on national energy transitions: A meta-theoretical framework. (March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cherp, Aleh; Vinichenko, Vadim; Jewell, Jessica; Brutschin, Elina; Sovacool, Benjamin
• Is Part Of: Energy research & social science. Volume 37(2018)
• Page Start: 175
• Page End: 190
• Publication Date: 2018-03
• Subjects: ACF Advocacy Coalition Framework -- CCS carbon capture and storage -- IAM Integrated Assessment Model -- MLP multi-level perspective -- SNM strategic niche management -- STS science, technology, and society/science and technology studies -- TIS technological innovation system -- TM transition management; Energy transitions -- Meta-theoretical framework -- Variables -- Co-evolution; Power resources -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; Energy consumption -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; 333.7905
• DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.015
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2214-6296

Abstract

Highlights: 3 perspectives on energy transitions: techno-economic, socio-technical and political. The techno-economic perspective has roots in energy systems analysis and economics. The socio-technical perspective has roots in evolutionary economics and STS. The political perspective has roots in political science and political economy. The perspectives structure a multi-tier framework with hierarchically organized variables. Abstract: Economic development, technological innovation, and policy change are especially prominent factors shaping energy transitions. Therefore explaining energy transitions requires combining insights from disciplines investigating these factors. The existing literature is not consistent in identifying these disciplines nor proposing how they can be combined. We conceptualize national energy transitions as a co-evolution of three types of systems: energy flows and markets, energy technologies, and energy-related policies. The focus on the three types of systems gives rise to three perspectives on national energy transitions: techno-economic with its roots in energy systems analysis and various domains of economics; socio-technical with its roots in sociology of technology, STS, and evolutionary economics; and political with its roots in political science. We use the three perspectives as an organizing principle to propose a meta-theoretical framework for analyzing national energy transitions. Following Elinor Ostrom's approach, the proposed framework explains national energy transitions through a nested conceptual map of variables and theories. In comparison with the existing meta-theoretical literature, the three perspectives framework elevates the role of political science since policies are likely to be increasingly prominent in shaping 21st century energy transitions.