Emissions from prescribed burning of timber slash piles in Oregon. (February 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Aurell, Johanna; Gullett, Brian K.; Tabor, Dennis; Yonker, Nick
• Is Part Of: Atmospheric environment. Volume 150(2017)
• Page Start: 395
• Page End: 406
• Publication Date: 2017-02
• Subjects: Emission factors -- Timber slash -- Pile cover -- Moisture -- Polyethylene -- Biomass burning; Air -- Pollution -- Periodicals; Air -- Pollution -- Meteorological aspects -- Periodicals; 551.51
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.11.034
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1352-2310

Abstract

Abstract: Emissions from burning piles of post-harvest timber slash (Douglas-fir) in Grande Ronde, Oregon were sampled using an instrument platform lofted into the plume using a tether-controlled aerostat or balloon. Emissions of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane, particulate matter (PM2.5 ), black carbon, ultraviolet absorbing PM, elemental/organic carbon, filter-based metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated dibenzodioxins/dibenzofurans (PCDD/PCDF), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were sampled to determine emission factors, the amount of pollutant formed per amount of biomass burned. The effect on emissions from covering the piles with polyethylene (PE) sheets to prevent fuel wetting versus uncovered piles was also determined. Results showed that the uncovered ("wet") piles burned with lower combustion efficiency and higher emission factors for VOCs, PM2.5, PCDD/PCDF, and PAHs. Removal of the PE prior to ignition, variation of PE size, and changing PE thickness resulted in no statistical distinction between emissions. Results suggest that dry piles, whether covered with PE or not, exhibited statistically significant lower emissions than wet piles due to better combustion efficiency. Graphical abstract: Highlights: Dry biomass piles burned with higher combustion efficiency than wet piles. Piles that had been covered with polyethylene had lower emissions than wet piles. Burning the polyethylene cover on the pile had no distinctive effect on emissions.