Apelin‐induced cardioprotection against ischaemia/reperfusion injury: roles of epidermal growth factor and Src. (30th August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Folino, A.; Accomasso, L.; Giachino, C.; Montarolo, P. G.; Losano, G.; Pagliaro, P.; Rastaldo, R.
• Is Part Of: Acta physiologica. Volume 222:Number 2(2018)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2017-08-30
• Subjects: contractility -- contracture -- epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation -- infarct size -- metalloproteinase -- reperfusion injury salvage kinases pathway; Physiology -- Periodicals; Physiology -- Research -- Periodicals; 612
• DOI: 10.1111/apha.12924
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1748-1708

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: Apelin, the ligand of the G‐protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR) APJ, exerts a post‐conditioning‐like protection against ischaemia/reperfusion injury through activation of PI3K‐Akt‐NO signalling. The pathway connecting APJ to PI3K is still unknown. As other GPCR ligands act through transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) via a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) or Src kinase, we investigated whether EGFR transactivation is involved in the following three features of apelin‐induced cardioprotection: limitation of infarct size, suppression of contracture and improvement of post‐ischaemic contractile recovery. Method: Isolated rat hearts underwent 30 min of global ischaemia and 2 h of reperfusion. Apelin (0.5 μm ) was infused during the first 20 min of reperfusion. EGFR, MMP or Src was inhibited to study the pathway connecting APJ to PI3K. Key components of RISK pathway, namely PI3K, guanylyl cyclase or mitochondrial K + ‐ATP channels, were also inhibited. Apelin‐induced EGFR and phosphatase and tensing homolog (PTEN) phosphorylation were assessed. Left ventricular pressure and infarct size were measured. Results: Apelin‐induced reductions in infarct size and myocardial contracture were prevented by the inhibition of EGFR, Src, MMP or RISK pathway. The involvement of EGFR was confirmed by its phosphorylation. However, neither direct EGFR nor MMP inhibition affected apelin‐induced improvement of early post‐ischaemic contractile recovery, which was suppressed by Src and RISK inhibitors only. Apelin also increased PTEN phosphorylation, which was removed by Src inhibition. Conclusion: While EGFR and MMP limit infarct size and contracture, Src or RISK pathway inhibition suppresses the three features of cardioprotection. Src does not only transactivate EGFR, but also inhibits PTEN by phosphorylation thus playing a crucial role in apelin‐induced cardioprotection.