Significant skin‐tightening by closure of fractional ablative laser holes. Issue 1 (23rd October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Russe, Elisabeth; Purschke, Martin; Limpiangkanan, Wikunda; Farinelli, William A.; Wang, Ying; Doukas, Apostolos G.; Sakamoto, Fernanda H.; Wechselberger, Gottfried; Anderson, Richard Rox
• Other Names: Geronemus Roy G. guestEditor.; Brauer Jeremy A. guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Lasers in surgery and medicine. Volume 50:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: 64
• Page End: 69
• Publication Date: 2017-10-23
• Subjects: fractional ablative laser -- tissue remodeling -- Erbium:YAG laser -- elastic adhesive dressing -- coring needle -- temporary wound closure -- laser skin tightening -- skin shrinkage -- skin tightening -- wound closure; Lasers in medicine -- Periodicals; Lasers in surgery -- Periodicals; 617
• DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22748
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0196-8092

Abstract

Abstract : Background and Objective: Ablative fractional laser treatment uses thousands of very small laser beam wounds to damage a fraction of the skin, which stimulates tissue remodeling. Each open micro‐wound heals without scarring, but the amount of skin tightening achieved is limited. This animal study was performed to test the hypothesis that immediate temporary closure of fractional laser wounds could increase skin tightening after fractional ablative laser treatment. Materials and Methods: Four adult swine were used for the study; 98 square test sites (3 × 3 cm) were tattooed on the abdomen and flanks of each pig. An ablative fractional Erbium:YAG laser (Sciton Profile, Sciton Inc, Palo Alto, CA) was used to treat the test areas. A laser micro‐spot fluence of 375 J/cm 2 was delivered in 150–250 microseconds pulses, resulting in an array of ablation channels extending 1.5 mm deep into the skin, with a spot size of 250 µm, with 10% treatment density. Immediately following laser exposure the resulting holes were closed using a stretched elastic adhesive dressing, which, when applied, recoiled and compressed the diameter of the ablation holes. The compressive dressings were removed after 7 days. This procedure was compared to removing the same amount of skin (10%) mechanically by specially designed 19 gauge coring needles, as well as to the same laser and coring methods without compression closure. Area and shape of test sites were measured by digital photography before and 28 days after treatment. Data analysis included compensation for animal growth, as measured by increase in the area of the untreated control sites. Results: All treated and control sites healed within a week, without scarring evident at 28 days. Laser treatment combined with compressive wound closure caused significant shrinkage at 28 days compared with untreated control sites. The treated skin area was reduced by 11.5% ( P = 0.0001). Needle coring with wound closure produced similar, significant shrinkage (8%, P < 0.0021), whereas laser and needle coring treatment without closure did not result in significant area reduction ( P = 0.1289) compared with untreated control sites. Conclusion: Significant skin tightening can be achieved by immediate temporary non‐invasive wound closure after short pulse Er:YAG fractional ablative laser treatment, as well as after mechanically removing skin with a coring needle. This approach may improve skin tightening after ablative laser treatments. Further clinical studies are necessary to confirm successful application in humans. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:64–69, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.