Validity of sound-proof approaches in rapidly-rotating compressible convection: marginal stability versus turbulence. Issue 1 (2nd January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Verhoeven, Jan; Glatzmaier, Gary A.
• Is Part Of: Geophysical and astrophysical fluid dynamics. Volume 112:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: 36
• Page End: 61
• Publication Date: 2018-01-02
• Subjects: Rotating compressible convection -- anelastic approximation -- pseudo-incompressible -- sound-proof; Fluid dynamics -- Periodicals; Astrophysics -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 551
• DOI: 10.1080/03091929.2017.1380800
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0309-1929

Abstract

Abstract: The validity of the anelastic approximation has recently been questioned in the regime of rapidly-rotating compressible convection in low Prandtl number fluids (Calkins, Julien and Marti, Proc. R. Soc. A, 2015, vol. 471, 20140689). Given the broad usage and the high computational efficiency of sound-proof approaches in this astrophysically relevant regime, this paper clarifies the conditions for a safe application. The potential of the alternative pseudo-incompressible approximation is investigated, which in contrast to the anelastic approximation is shown to never break down for predicting the point of marginal stability. Its accuracy, however, decreases close to the parameters corresponding to the failure of the anelastic approach, which is shown to occur when the sound-crossing time of the domain exceeds a rotation time scale, i.e. for rotational Mach numbers greater than one. Concerning the supercritical case, which is naturally characterised by smaller rotational Mach numbers, we find that the anelastic approximation does not show unphysical behaviour. Growth rates computed with the linearised anelastic equations converge toward the corresponding fully compressible values as the Rayleigh number increases. Likewise, our fully nonlinear turbulent simulations, produced with our fully compressible and anelastic models and carried out in a highly supercritical, rotating, compressible, low Prandtl number regime show good agreement. However, this nonlinear test example is for only a moderately low convective Rossby number of 0.14.