Relational Power, Legitimation, and Pregnancy Discrimination. (June 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Byron, Reginald A.; Roscigno, Vincent J.
• Is Part Of: Gender & society. Volume 28:Number 3(2014:Jun.)
• Page Start: 435
• Page End: 462
• Publication Date: 2014-06
• Subjects: pregnancy -- discrimination -- termination -- power -- legitimation; Sex role -- Periodicals; Feminism -- Periodicals; 305.42
• DOI: 10.1177/0891243214523123
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0891-2432

Abstract

Pregnancy-based employment discrimination has long been a topic of interest for gender inequality scholars and civil rights agencies. Prior work suggests that employer stereotypes and financial interests leave pregnant women vulnerable to being fired. We still know little, however, about women's interpretations of their terminations and how employers justify such decisions in the face of arguably protective laws. This article provides much needed, in-depth analyses of such dynamics and a relational account of pregnancy-based employment discrimination claims. Elaborating on theoretical expositions of power and research surrounding the patriarchal character of organizational life, we draw on unique quantitative and qualitative data from verified cases of pregnancy-based firing discrimination. Our analyses reveal a two-pronged legitimation process where employers symbolically vilified pregnant workers while simultaneously amplifying ostensibly meritocratic organizational procedures and concerns. Pregnancy discrimination plaintiffs attempted to counter employer arguments. Yet, their limited power within the organizational hierarchy along with the culturally resonant nature of employer logics—logics that seem gender-neutral but that reify gendered assumptions and prioritize business profit—place pregnant women at a considerable disadvantage. Without attending to such cultural and structural power imbalances and the relational processes that undergird them, pregnancy discrimination will remain a significant problem.