A comparison of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D and filtered back projection in craniocervical CT angiography. Issue 1 (January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yu, S.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, J.; Xu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Song, Z.
• Is Part Of: Clinical radiology. Volume 72:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 96.e1
• Page End: 96.e6
• Publication Date: 2017-01
• Subjects: Medical radiology -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiology -- Periodicals; Societies, Medical -- Periodicals; Medical radiology; Radiotherapy; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.08.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0009-9260

Abstract

Abstract : Aim: To compare the effects of exposure parameters on image quality and radiation dose for craniocervical computed tomography angiography (CTA) using adaptive iterative dose reduction in three dimensions (AIDR 3D) and filtered back projection (FBP) algorithms. Materials and methods: One hundred and eighty patients were divided into three groups; group A (120 kV, 300 mA, FBP), group B (100 kV, automatic mA, AIDR 3D) and group C (80kV, automatic mA, AIDR 3D). Image quality and radiation dose were evaluated for each group. Results: For both cervical and intracranial vessels, CT attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were higher in the AIDR 3D groups. The difference in mean vascular noise was also statistically significant ( p <0.001), with group B having the lowest value at 16.5±3.2 HU and group C having the highest at 19.1±2.9 HU. FBP reconstruction resulted in lower image-quality scores for the common carotid artery. Parenchymal image-quality scores also varied significantly different between groups with group C partially failing to meet the minimum standards for diagnostic use. For the middle cerebral artery, image-quality scores were significantly better in group A, although images from groups B and C also satisfied clinical diagnostic requirements. The image quality of the internal carotid artery was the best in group B. Image-quality scores between groups were not significantly different for the carotid sinus. Radiation doses in the groups using AIDR 3D were >70% lower than in the FBP group. Conclusion: AIDR 3D (100 kV, automatic modulation) provides optimal image quality of vascular and parenchymal tissues at significantly lower radiation doses (mSV) than FBP in craniocervical CTA. For cases in which highly accurate parenchymal assessment is not required, the tube voltage can be lowered to 80 kV to further decrease radiation dose. Highlights: Low tube voltage, automatic current modulation and AIDR3D produce high quality CTA images. The calculated exposure is automatically reduced by up to 75% with the inclusion of AIDR3D. The present study considered and evaluated parenchymal image quality on CTA.