Pregnancy Ambivalence and Long‐Acting Reversible Contraceptive (LARC) Use Among Young Adult Women: A Qualitative Study. Issue 3 (17th April 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Pregnancy Ambivalence and Long‐Acting Reversible Contraceptive (LARC) Use Among Young Adult Women: A Qualitative Study. Issue 3 (17th April 2017)
- Main Title:
- Pregnancy Ambivalence and Long‐Acting Reversible Contraceptive (LARC) Use Among Young Adult Women: A Qualitative Study
- Authors:
- Higgins, Jenny A.
- Abstract:
- Abstract: CONTEXT: Many young adults are unclear about how much they want to have, or prevent having, a baby. However, pregnancy ambivalence is an underexamined factor in the uptake of long‐acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods—IUDs and implants—the most effective methods available. METHODS: In 2014, investigators conducted six focus groups and 12 interviews with 50 women aged 18–29 in Dane County, Wisconsin; participants were either university students or community residents receiving public assistance. A modified grounded theory approach was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Four themes emerged. First, participants described a pregnancy desire spectrum: Those strongly motivated to avoid pregnancy were most receptive to LARC methods, while those with less clear or mixed desires worried that these methods would prevent "accidental" pregnancies that might not be unwelcome. Second, women within a few years of wanting children perceived LARC methods as too "permanent, " despite awareness of their reversibility. Third, age and life stage were important factors: Younger women and those attending school or beginning careers were more likely than others to consider these methods because they had clearer motivations to avoid pregnancy. Finally, relationship stage influenced receptiveness to LARC methods: Women in newer relationships were more receptive than were those in longer term relationships who imagined having a baby with their partner someday. CONCLUSION:Abstract: CONTEXT: Many young adults are unclear about how much they want to have, or prevent having, a baby. However, pregnancy ambivalence is an underexamined factor in the uptake of long‐acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods—IUDs and implants—the most effective methods available. METHODS: In 2014, investigators conducted six focus groups and 12 interviews with 50 women aged 18–29 in Dane County, Wisconsin; participants were either university students or community residents receiving public assistance. A modified grounded theory approach was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Four themes emerged. First, participants described a pregnancy desire spectrum: Those strongly motivated to avoid pregnancy were most receptive to LARC methods, while those with less clear or mixed desires worried that these methods would prevent "accidental" pregnancies that might not be unwelcome. Second, women within a few years of wanting children perceived LARC methods as too "permanent, " despite awareness of their reversibility. Third, age and life stage were important factors: Younger women and those attending school or beginning careers were more likely than others to consider these methods because they had clearer motivations to avoid pregnancy. Finally, relationship stage influenced receptiveness to LARC methods: Women in newer relationships were more receptive than were those in longer term relationships who imagined having a baby with their partner someday. CONCLUSION: Effectiveness is not the only factor in women's selection and use of contraceptive methods. Individual preferences will lead some women to choose non‐LARC methods even when fully informed of their options. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health. Volume 49:Issue 3(2017:Sep.)
- Journal:
- Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health
- Issue:
- Volume 49:Issue 3(2017:Sep.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 49, Issue 3 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 49
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0049-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 149
- Page End:
- 156
- Publication Date:
- 2017-04-17
- Subjects:
- Birth control -- Periodicals
Birth control -- United States -- Periodicals
Reproductive health -- United States -- Periodicals
Family planning services -- Periodicals
363.96 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1931-2393 ↗
http://www.guttmacher.org/journals/psrh.html ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/15386341.html ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1363/psrh.12025 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1538-6341
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6428.163760
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5691.xml