Preduodenal superior mesenteric vein and Whipple procedure with vascular reconstruction—A case report. (2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Höing, Kristina; Ringe, Kristina I.; Bektas, Hüseyin; Klempnauer, Jürgen; Jäger, Mark D.
• Is Part Of: International journal of surgery case reports. Volume 10(2015)
• Page Start: 107
• Page End: 110
• Publication Date: 2015
• Subjects: PDSMV preduodenal superior mesenteric vein -- PPPD pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy -- PTFE polytetrafluoroethylene -- PV portal vein -- SMV superior mesenteric vein -- SV splenic vein; Portal vein disorder -- Preduodenal superior mesenteric vein -- Pancreaticoduodenectomy -- Portal vein reconstruction -- Portal vein thrombosis -- Prosthetic graft thrombosis; Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgical Procedures, Operative -- Periodicals; Surgery; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 617.005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.03.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2210-2612

Abstract

Highlights: A preduodenal superior mesenteric vein (SMV) is a rare portal vein disorder. Correct assessment of portal vein disorders can allow for hepato-pancreatic surgery. A preduodenal SMV does not contradict a Whipple procedure. Resection of a preduodenal SMV required a PTFE prosthesis. Preserved venous collateral pathways compensate late thrombosis of PTFE prosthesis. Abstract: Introduction: Portal vein (PV) disorders are various, but rare. Here, we report a preduodenal superior mesenteric vein (PDSMV) in a patient who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Presentation of case: A 67-year old woman with familial adenomatosis polyposis was suspicious for cancer of the papilla of vater and scheduled for surgery. Pre-operative diagnostic revealed a PDSMV continuing into the left PV. The splenic vein (SV) continued directly into the right PV without forming ananatomic PV confluence. Eight centimetre of the PDSMV were resected during the pancreaticoduodenectomy and reconnected using a polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis. On day 1, early graft thrombosis was treated by thrombectomy and change to a larger graft. Pathology confirmed a R0-resection of the adenocarcinoma of the papilla of vater (pTis pN0, G2). At three-month follow-up, the patient was cancer-free and clinically asymptomatic, although, a late graft thrombosis with accompanying newly build venous collaterals passing mesenteric blood to the SV were found. Discussion: Rare PV disorders like a PDSMV do not contradict pancreatic surgery, but should be treated in experienced centres. Skills of SMV/PV reconstruction and its peri-operative management might be beneficial for successful outcome. Despite late graft thrombosis no clinical disadvantage occurred most likely due to preservation of the SV and of potential venous collateral pathways. Conclusion: Extended surgical procedures like a pancreaticoduodenectomy are realisable in patients with PV disorders, but require awareness, adequate radiological interpretation and specific surgical experience for secure treatment.