A comparison of linear approaches to filter out environmental effects in structural health monitoring. (15th May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Deraemaeker, A.; Worden, K.
• Is Part Of: Mechanical systems and signal processing. Volume 105(2018)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 15
• Publication Date: 2018-05-15
• Subjects: Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) -- Environmental effects -- Mahalanobis squared-distance -- Principal Component Analysis (PCA) -- Factor analysis; Structural dynamics -- Periodicals; Vibration -- Periodicals; Constructions -- Dynamique -- Périodiques; Vibration -- Périodiques; Structural dynamics; Vibration; Periodicals; 621
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.045
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0888-3270

Abstract

Highlights: The Mahalanobis squared-distance is used to filter out environmental effects. A comparison with principal component analysis and factor analysis is made. The three methods are applied to real data from a laboratory experiment. A threshold estimation technique is used based on extreme value statistics. Abstract: This paper discusses the possibility of using the Mahalanobis squared-distance to perform robust novelty detection in the presence of important environmental variability in a multivariate feature vector. By performing an eigenvalue decomposition of the covariance matrix used to compute that distance, it is shown that the Mahalanobis squared-distance can be written as the sum of independent terms which result from a transformation from the feature vector space to a space of independent variables. In general, especially when the size of the features vector is large, there are dominant eigenvalues and eigenvectors associated with the covariance matrix, so that a set of principal components can be defined. Because the associated eigenvalues are high, their contribution to the Mahalanobis squared-distance is low, while the contribution of the other components is high due to the low value of the associated eigenvalues. This analysis shows that the Mahalanobis distance naturally filters out the variability in the training data. This property can be used to remove the effect of the environment in damage detection, in much the same way as two other established techniques, principal component analysis and factor analysis. The three techniques are compared here using real experimental data from a wooden bridge for which the feature vector consists in eigenfrequencies and modeshapes collected under changing environmental conditions, as well as damaged conditions simulated with an added mass. The results confirm the similarity between the three techniques and the ability to filter out environmental effects, while keeping a high sensitivity to structural changes. The results also show that even after filtering out the environmental effects, the normality assumption cannot be made for the residual feature vector. An alternative is demonstrated here based on extreme value statistics which results in a much better threshold which avoids false positives in the training data, while allowing detection of all damaged cases.