A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics of Methylphenidate Extended‐Release Orally Disintegrating Tablets With a Reference Extended‐Release Formulation of Methylphenidate in Healthy Adults. Issue 2 (25th May 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics of Methylphenidate Extended‐Release Orally Disintegrating Tablets With a Reference Extended‐Release Formulation of Methylphenidate in Healthy Adults. Issue 2 (25th May 2017)
- Main Title:
- A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics of Methylphenidate Extended‐Release Orally Disintegrating Tablets With a Reference Extended‐Release Formulation of Methylphenidate in Healthy Adults
- Authors:
- Childress, Ann
Stark, Jeffrey G.
McMahen, Russ
Engelking, Dorothy
Sikes, Carolyn - Abstract:
- Abstract: Extended‐release (ER) methylphenidate (MPH) is a first‐line treatment for attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder. A methylphenidate extended‐release orally disintegrating tablet (MPH XR‐ODT) has recently been developed. This was a randomized, open‐label, 3‐period, 3‐treatment study comparing the bioavailability and absorption of 2 MPH XR‐ODT formulations with an MPH ER reference medication. Here we report the 2 treatments comparing the commercial MPH XR‐ODT formulation and reference medication. Following a ≥10‐hour fast, 42 healthy adults received 60 mg of reference medication or MPH XR‐ODT (2 × 30 mg). The following pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated for total methylphenidate ( d + l ): maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ), time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax ), terminal half‐life (T1/2 ), and areas under the concentration–time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast ), and from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf ). Secondary PK end points included partial AUCs. Safety was also assessed. Overall systemic exposure to methylphenidate after MPH XR‐ODT administration was similar to that of the reference product, and the concentration–time profiles for MPH XR‐ODT and the reference drug were similar, although the Cmax was 25% higher for MPH XR‐ODT. The most common treatment‐emergent adverse events were nausea (6) and anxiety (4), which were similar across treatments.
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical pharmacology in drug development. Volume 7:Issue 2(2018)
- Journal:
- Clinical pharmacology in drug development
- Issue:
- Volume 7:Issue 2(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 7, Issue 2 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 7
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0007-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 151
- Page End:
- 159
- Publication Date:
- 2017-05-25
- Subjects:
- clinical research -- clinical trials -- drug delivery -- pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism -- psychiatry -- ADHD
Drugs -- Testing -- Periodicals
Drug development -- Periodicals
Clinical pharmacology -- Periodicals
615.580724 - Journal URLs:
- http://cpd.sagepub.com ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/%28ISSN%292160-7648 ↗
http://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2160-7648/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/cpdd.362 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2160-7648
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.330300
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5644.xml