The diffuse Nitsche method: Dirichlet constraints on phase‐field boundaries. (25th August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nguyen, Lam H.; Stoter, Stein K.F.; Ruess, Martin; Sanchez Uribe, Manuel A.; Schillinger, Dominik
• Is Part Of: International journal for numerical methods in engineering. Volume 113:Number 4(2018)
• Page Start: 601
• Page End: 633
• Publication Date: 2017-08-25
• Subjects: diffuse domain methods -- phase‐fields -- the diffuse Nitsche method -- weak Dirichlet boundary conditions; Numerical analysis -- Periodicals; Engineering mathematics -- Periodicals; 620.001518
• DOI: 10.1002/nme.5628
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0029-5981

Abstract

Summary: We explore diffuse formulations of Nitsche's method for consistently imposing Dirichlet boundary conditions on phase‐field approximations of sharp domains. Leveraging the properties of the phase‐field gradient, we derive the variational formulation of the diffuse Nitsche method by transferring all integrals associated with the Dirichlet boundary from a geometrically sharp surface format in the standard Nitsche method to a geometrically diffuse volumetric format. We also derive conditions for the stability of the discrete system and formulate a diffuse local eigenvalue problem, from which the stabilization parameter can be estimated automatically in each element. We advertise metastable phase‐field solutions of the Allen‐Cahn problem for transferring complex imaging data into diffuse geometric models. In particular, we discuss the use of mixed meshes, that is, an adaptively refined mesh for the phase‐field in the diffuse boundary region and a uniform mesh for the representation of the physics‐based solution fields. We illustrate accuracy and convergence properties of the diffuse Nitsche method and demonstrate its advantages over diffuse penalty‐type methods. In the context of imaging‐based analysis, we show that the diffuse Nitsche method achieves the same accuracy as the standard Nitsche method with sharp surfaces, if the inherent length scales, ie, the interface width of the phase‐field, the voxel spacing, and the mesh size, are properly related. We demonstrate the flexibility of the new method by analyzing stresses in a human vertebral body.