Extinct, obscure or imaginary: The lizard species with the smallest ranges. Issue 2 (23rd November 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Extinct, obscure or imaginary: The lizard species with the smallest ranges. Issue 2 (23rd November 2017)
- Main Title:
- Extinct, obscure or imaginary: The lizard species with the smallest ranges
- Authors:
- Meiri, Shai
Bauer, Aaron M.
Allison, Allen
Castro‐Herrera, Fernando
Chirio, Laurent
Colli, Guarino
Das, Indraneil
Doan, Tiffany M.
Glaw, Frank
Grismer, Lee L.
Hoogmoed, Marinus
Kraus, Fred
LeBreton, Matthew
Meirte, Danny
Nagy, Zoltán T.
Nogueira, Cristiano de C.
Oliver, Paul
Pauwels, Olivier S. G.
Pincheira‐Donoso, Daniel
Shea, Glenn
Sindaco, Roberto
Tallowin, Oliver J. S.
Torres‐Carvajal, Omar
Trape, Jean‐Francois
Uetz, Peter
Wagner, Philipp
Wang, Yuezhao
Ziegler, Thomas
Roll, Uri - Editors:
- Stevens, George
- Abstract:
- Abstract: Aim: Small geographic ranges make species especially prone to extinction from anthropogenic disturbances or natural stochastic events. We assemble and analyse a comprehensive dataset of all the world's lizard species and identify the species with the smallest ranges—those known only from their type localities. We compare them to wide‐ranging species to infer whether specific geographic regions or biological traits predispose species to have small ranges. Location: Global. Methods: We extensively surveyed museum collections, the primary literature and our own field records to identify all the species of lizards with a maximum linear geographic extent of <10 km. We compared their biogeography, key biological traits and threat status to those of all other lizards. Results: One in seven lizards (927 of the 6, 568 currently recognized species) are known only from their type localities. These include 213 species known only from a single specimen. Compared to more wide‐ranging taxa, they mostly inhabit relatively inaccessible regions at lower, mostly tropical, latitudes. Surprisingly, we found that burrowing lifestyle is a relatively unimportant driver of small range size. Geckos are especially prone to having tiny ranges, and skinks dominate lists of such species not seen for over 50 years, as well as of species known only from their holotype. Two‐thirds of these species have no IUCN assessments, and at least 20 are extinct. Main conclusions: Fourteen per cent of lizardAbstract: Aim: Small geographic ranges make species especially prone to extinction from anthropogenic disturbances or natural stochastic events. We assemble and analyse a comprehensive dataset of all the world's lizard species and identify the species with the smallest ranges—those known only from their type localities. We compare them to wide‐ranging species to infer whether specific geographic regions or biological traits predispose species to have small ranges. Location: Global. Methods: We extensively surveyed museum collections, the primary literature and our own field records to identify all the species of lizards with a maximum linear geographic extent of <10 km. We compared their biogeography, key biological traits and threat status to those of all other lizards. Results: One in seven lizards (927 of the 6, 568 currently recognized species) are known only from their type localities. These include 213 species known only from a single specimen. Compared to more wide‐ranging taxa, they mostly inhabit relatively inaccessible regions at lower, mostly tropical, latitudes. Surprisingly, we found that burrowing lifestyle is a relatively unimportant driver of small range size. Geckos are especially prone to having tiny ranges, and skinks dominate lists of such species not seen for over 50 years, as well as of species known only from their holotype. Two‐thirds of these species have no IUCN assessments, and at least 20 are extinct. Main conclusions: Fourteen per cent of lizard diversity is restricted to a single location, often in inaccessible regions. These species are elusive, usually poorly known and little studied. Many face severe extinction risk, but current knowledge is inadequate to properly assess this for all of them. We recommend that such species become the focus of taxonomic, ecological and survey efforts. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Diversity & distributions. Volume 24:Issue 2(2018)
- Journal:
- Diversity & distributions
- Issue:
- Volume 24:Issue 2(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 24, Issue 2 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 24
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0024-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 262
- Page End:
- 273
- Publication Date:
- 2017-11-23
- Subjects:
- accessibility -- endemism -- extinction -- geckos -- holotype -- range size -- skinks -- threat -- type locality
Biodiversity -- Periodicals
Biodiversity conservation -- Periodicals
577 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=ddi ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1472-4642 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/ddi.12678 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1366-9516
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3604.271107
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5613.xml