Physical function metric over measure: An illustration with the Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT). Issue 1 (8th September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kaat, Aaron J.; Schalet, Benjamin D.; Rutsohn, Joshua; Jensen, Roxanne E.; Cella, David
• Is Part Of: Cancer. Volume 124:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: 153
• Page End: 160
• Publication Date: 2017-09-08
• Subjects: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) -- item response theory -- linking -- Physical Function -- Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS); Cancer -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Cytopathology -- Periodicals; 616.99405
• DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30981
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0008-543X

Abstract

Abstract : BACKGROUND: Measuring patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) is becoming an integral component of quality improvement initiatives, clinical care, and research studies in cancer, including comparative effectiveness research. However, the number of PROs limits comparability across studies. Herein, the authors attempted to link the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐General Physical Well‐Being (FACT‐G PWB) subscale with the Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) calibrated item bank. The also sought to augment a subset of the conceptually most similar FACT‐G PWB items with PROMIS PF items to improve the linking. METHODS: Baseline data from 5506 participants in the Measuring Your Health (MY‐Health) study were used to identify the optimal items for linking FACT‐G PWB with PROMIS PF. A mixed methods approach identified the optimal items for creating the 5‐item FACT/PROMIS‐PF5 scale. Both the linked and augmented relationships were cross‐validated using the follow‐up MY‐Health data. RESULTS: A 5‐item FACT‐G PWB item subset was found to be optimal for linking with PROMIS PF. In addition, a 2‐item subset, including only items that were conceptually very similar to the PROMIS item bank content, were augmented with 3 PROMIS PF items. This new FACT/PROMIS‐PF5 provided superior score recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS PF metric allows for the evaluation of the extent to which similar questionnaires can be linked and therefore expressed on the same metric. These results allow for the aggregation of existing data and provide an optimal measure for future studies wishing to use the FACT yet also report on the PROMIS PF metric. Cancer 2018;124:153‐60 . © 2017 American Cancer Society . Abstract : Physical function is an important patient‐centered endpoint in oncology research and practice. By linking the Physical Well‐Being subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) questionnaire with the Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function item bank, the authors illustrate how comparative effectiveness research can be enhanced by common reporting of a physical function metric, regardless of the actual measure used.