A comfort assessment of existing cervical orthoses. Issue 2 (1st February 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A comfort assessment of existing cervical orthoses. Issue 2 (1st February 2018)
- Main Title:
- A comfort assessment of existing cervical orthoses
- Authors:
- Langley, Joe
Pancani, Silvia
Kilner, Karen
Reed, Heath
Stanton, Andy
Heron, Nicola
Judge, Simon
McCarthy, Avril
Baxter, Susan
Mazzà, Claudia
McDermott, Christopher J. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Purpose: Identify location and intensity of discomfort experienced by healthy participants wearing cervical orthoses. Method: Convenience sample of 34 healthy participants wore Stro II, Philadelphia, Headmaster, and AspenVista ® cervical orthoses for four-hour periods. Participants reported discomfort level (scale 0–6) and location. Results: Participants reported mean discomfort for all orthoses over the four-hour test between 'a little discomfort' and 'very uncomfortable' (mean discomfort score = 1.64, SD = 1.50). Seven participants prematurely stopped tests due to pain and six reported maximum discomfort scores. Significant linear increase in discomfort with duration of wear was found for all orthoses. Significantly less discomfort was reported with Stro II than Headmaster and Philadelphia. Age correlated with greater perceived discomfort. Orthoses differed in the location discomfort was experienced. Conclusion: Existing cervical orthoses cause discomfort influenced by design and duration of wear with orthoses' design the more significant factor. This work informed the design of a new orthosis and future orthoses developments. Practitioner Summary: The purpose of this study was to gain greater knowledge about the discomfort caused by wearing of existing neck orthoses in order to inform the design and development of a new neck orthosis. This study gathers empirical data from a surrogate population and concludes that orthosis design is more influential than theAbstract: Purpose: Identify location and intensity of discomfort experienced by healthy participants wearing cervical orthoses. Method: Convenience sample of 34 healthy participants wore Stro II, Philadelphia, Headmaster, and AspenVista ® cervical orthoses for four-hour periods. Participants reported discomfort level (scale 0–6) and location. Results: Participants reported mean discomfort for all orthoses over the four-hour test between 'a little discomfort' and 'very uncomfortable' (mean discomfort score = 1.64, SD = 1.50). Seven participants prematurely stopped tests due to pain and six reported maximum discomfort scores. Significant linear increase in discomfort with duration of wear was found for all orthoses. Significantly less discomfort was reported with Stro II than Headmaster and Philadelphia. Age correlated with greater perceived discomfort. Orthoses differed in the location discomfort was experienced. Conclusion: Existing cervical orthoses cause discomfort influenced by design and duration of wear with orthoses' design the more significant factor. This work informed the design of a new orthosis and future orthoses developments. Practitioner Summary: The purpose of this study was to gain greater knowledge about the discomfort caused by wearing of existing neck orthoses in order to inform the design and development of a new neck orthosis. This study gathers empirical data from a surrogate population and concludes that orthosis design is more influential than the duration of wear. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Ergonomics. Volume 61:Issue 2(2018)
- Journal:
- Ergonomics
- Issue:
- Volume 61:Issue 2(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 61, Issue 2 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 61
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0061-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 329
- Page End:
- 338
- Publication Date:
- 2018-02-01
- Subjects:
- Comfort assessment -- neck collar -- neck support -- Motor Neurone Disease -- amyotrophic lateral sclerosis -- neck weakness -- assistive technology -- Head-up
Human engineering -- Periodicals
Cybernetics -- Periodicals
Industrial management -- Periodicals
Ergonomie -- Périodiques
Cybernétique -- Périodiques
Gestion d'entreprise -- Périodiques
620.8205 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/terg20/current ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/00140139.2017.1353137 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0014-0139
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3808.500000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5563.xml