A just judgement? Considerations on Ronald Srigley's Camus' Critique of Modernity. (February 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sharpe, Matthew
• Other Names: Bankovsky Miriam guest-editor.; Nicolacopoulos Toula guest-editor.; Vassilacopoulos George guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: Thesis eleven. Volume 120:Number 1(2014:Feb.)
• Page Start: 43
• Page End: 58
• Publication Date: 2014-02
• Subjects: Blumenberg -- Camus -- modernity -- problem of evil -- Srigley; Social sciences -- Philosophy -- Periodicals; 301
• DOI: 10.1177/0725513613519587
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0725-5136

Abstract

This paper responds critically to Ronald Srigley's groundbreaking 2011 study Albert Camus' Critique of Modernity . Srigley's book reasserts Camus' credentials as a deeply serious thinker, whose literary and philosophical oeuvre was dedicated to rethinking modernity on the basis of critical reassessments of the West's entire premodern heritage. Yet we challenge whether Camus was ever, even in his final writings, so uncompromisingly anti-modern as Srigley contends. Srigley's attempt to present Camus as committed to a return to the Greeks, on the basis of a total critique of modernity as deleteriously post-Christian, forces him to occlude important distinctions in Camus' thought: those between unity and totality, rebellion and revolution. By contrast, we compare Camus' defence of modern rebellion with Blumenberg's argument in The Legitimacy of the Modern Age : finding justification for this rebellion in the deep problem faced by Christian theology of resolving the 'problem of evil'. Finally, we suggest that Srigley overplays the extent of Camus' 'Hellenic' critique of the Christian heritage (notably its ethical commitment to protecting the weak), in contrast to Christian theodicy and eschatology, which serve to rationalize avoidable suffering.