Walking down 'Via Dolorosa' from primary health care to the specialty pain clinic – patient and professional perceptions of inequity in rehabilitation of chronic pain. Issue 1 (25th February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lehti, Arja; Fjellman‐Wiklund, Anncristine; Stålnacke, Britt‐Marie; Hammarström, Anne; Wiklund, Maria
• Is Part Of: Scandinavian journal of caring sciences. Volume 31:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 45
• Page End: 53
• Publication Date: 2016-02-25
• Subjects: rehabilitation -- chronic pain -- equity -- gender -- qualitative method; Nursing -- Periodicals; Therapeutics -- Periodicals; 362.1
• DOI: 10.1111/scs.12312
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0283-9318

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To analyse patient and professional perceptions about (in)equity of care and rehabilitation of chronic pain patients from primary health care to assessment at a specialty rehabilitation clinic. Setting and methods: This qualitative study consists one focus group interview with eight general practitioners who refer patients to pain rehabilitation clinics, 10 individual interviews with patients who were assessed at a pain rehabilitation clinic and seven interviews with professionals participating in multimodal assessment teams at a pain rehabilitation clinic. Interview analysis was conducted by the grounded theory method. Results: The core category Via Dolorosa, the way of suffering and pain, captured how gender and sociocultural context may contribute to advantages and disadvantages during patient journeys from primary health care to a pain rehabilitation clinic. Patients and professionals perceived pain as a low‐ranking illness, and women and men used different gendered strategies to legitimise the pain and to be taken seriously. Being 'a proper patient ready to change' and having 'likeness' between patients and professionals were viewed as advantageous in rehabilitation of pain patients. Patients with higher educational levels were perceived as easier to interact with and had better access to health care. Professional thoughts about gender norms influenced the rehabilitation options. The rehabilitation programme was seen by several professionals to be better suited for women than men, which could lead to unequal care. Conclusion: From an equity and gender perspective, our study highlights the complexity in rehabilitation of chronic pain patients – both from patient and professional perspectives. Awareness of gendered and the biased preconceptions and norms is crucial when professionals struggle to offer equitable health care and rehabilitation.